2015 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2015.7402527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Globally Asymptotically Stable Attitude Observer on SO(3)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the best stability result one can achieve with the continuous timeinvariant observers, for inertial navigation, is almost global asymptotic stability. Motivated by the hybrid observers designed on the Lie groups SO(3) and SE(3) in [6], [32], [38], [39], observer ( 14)-( 15) can be hybridized by introducing a resetting mechanism that prevents the state variables from converging to or getting stuck at the undesired equilibrium points of the closed-loop system [19]. Applying the framework of hybrid dynamical systems [40]- [42], the equilibrium point ( R = I 3 , p = ṽ = 0) for the hybrid version of the observer ( 17)-( 19) (with both fixed-gain and variable-gain approaches) is uniformly globally exponentially stable [19, Theorem 1 and Theorem 2].…”
Section: Motivated By the Geometric Nonlinear Observers On Se(3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the best stability result one can achieve with the continuous timeinvariant observers, for inertial navigation, is almost global asymptotic stability. Motivated by the hybrid observers designed on the Lie groups SO(3) and SE(3) in [6], [32], [38], [39], observer ( 14)-( 15) can be hybridized by introducing a resetting mechanism that prevents the state variables from converging to or getting stuck at the undesired equilibrium points of the closed-loop system [19]. Applying the framework of hybrid dynamical systems [40]- [42], the equilibrium point ( R = I 3 , p = ṽ = 0) for the hybrid version of the observer ( 17)-( 19) (with both fixed-gain and variable-gain approaches) is uniformly globally exponentially stable [19, Theorem 1 and Theorem 2].…”
Section: Motivated By the Geometric Nonlinear Observers On Se(3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the attitude estimation literature addresses the case of magnetic heading attitude estimation using MEMS IMUs (Crassidis et al, 2007; Guo et al, 2008; Hamel and Mahony, 2006; Metni et al, 2005, 2006; Wu et al, 2015). Mahony et al (2008) reported an attitude nonlinear complementary filter on SO ( 3 ) .…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as a low-frequency estimate of (23). This approximation (25) is used in Costanzi et al (2016), Mahony et al (2008), Pflimlin et al (2007), and Wu et al (2015). Figure 2 presents the vehicle acceleration experienced by the JHU ROV in the vehicle trial.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attitude can be estimated through Gaussian filters which often consider unit-quaternion in the representation, such as Kalman filter (KF) [6], extended KF (EKF) [7], and multiplicative EKF (MEKF) [8]. However, to successfully address the nonlinear nature of the attitude problem a nonlinear deterministic filter evolved directly on the Special Orthogonal Group SO (3) can be used [3][4][5][9][10][11][12]. As a matter of fact, nonlinear deterministic attitude filters are simpler in derivation, require less computational power, and demonstrate better tracking performance in comparison with Gaussian filters [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider the pose kinematics in(10) and the group of noise-free velocity measurements in(11) where Y m = Ω + b, in addition to other vector measurements given in(8) and(9)coupled with the filter in (26), (27), (28), (29), and (30). Let Assumption 1 hold.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%