Globalized supply chains: Emergent telecouplings in Mexico’s beef economy and environmental leakages

Galván-Miyoshi, Yankuic; Simmons, Cynthia; Walker, Robert; Osorio, Gilberto Aranda; Hernández, Pedro Martı́nez; Maldonado‐Simán, Ema; Warf, Barney; Astier, Marta; Waylen, Michael

doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102486

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…One is the volume of traded products, depending on their central and peripheral status in the global trade network (Petridis et al, 2020; Pu et al, 2019). The other is the quality of traded products that depends on their upstream and downstream status in the global value chain (Galvan‐Miyoshi et al, 2022; Gehl Sampath & Vallejo, 2018; Raei et al, 2019). Previous studies focus on the environmental impacts of trade in EGs, the EG lists making and trade benefits, environmental regulation and benefit distribution, thus they lack the comparative perspective to identify contradictions between developed and developing countries in trade practice (Costantini & Crespi, 2008; Wang, He, & Song, 2021; Zugravu‐Soilita, 2018).…”

Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How does global trade in environmental goods contribute to the SDGs in developing countries?

Wang

Mao

Huang

2023

Sustainable Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Global trade in environmental goods (EGs) has provided a new vision for international cooperation in response to sustainable development goals (SDGs). However, there are ongoing debates over whether developing countries can achieve sustainability during their trade participation. This study proposes a conceptual framework to observe countries' current trade status and potential for benefit from global EG trade. By tracing the changing status of 142 countries in the conceptual framework during 2001–2019, this study finds that global EG trade reduces inequality among developed countries while it increases inequality among developing countries. Some emerging market countries may enhance their status in the global trade network, but their upgrading within the global value chain remains slow. The current poor EG trade state and limited benefit potential of most developing countries will have a non‐significant impact in terms of achieving the SDGs. The study suggests that regional trade will give developing countries a better chance to integrate into trade markets and support them toward achieving the SDGs.

show abstract

Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How does global trade in environmental goods contribute to the SDGs in developing countries?

Wang

Mao

Huang

2023

Sustainable Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Broader applicability of the metacoupling framework than Tobler’s first law of geography for global sustainability: A systematic review

Manning

Li²,

Liu³

2023

Geography and Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Double-edged sword: China’s free trade agreements reinforces embodied greenhouse gas transfers in agricultural products

Hu,

Zou,

et al. 2024

Humanit Soc Sci Commun

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

China, as the world’s largest importer, heavily relies on agricultural products. However, the impact of China’s free trade agreements (FTAs) on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions embodied in agricultural product imports has been overlooked. It’s crucial to analyze changes in embodied GHG emissions resulting from FTAs. We categorize 367 agricultural products into 15 categories and construct a dataset on the embodied GHG emissions of these products imported by China from 119 countries between 2000 and 2015. Using the Propensity Score Matching (PSM)-progressive difference-in-differences (DID) method, our findings indicate that China’s FTAs have double-edged impact on agricultural product imports. It has positively influenced imports, with a 12.22% annual growth rate, promoting economic integration. However, it has negatively affected GHG emissions, leading to a 53.00% increase in emissions from agricultural imports. These findings highlight the importance of addressing production and consumption in reducing GHG strategies with agricultural products.

show abstract

Globalized supply chains: Emergent telecouplings in Mexico’s beef economy and environmental leakages

Cited by 3 publications

References 24 publications

How does global trade in environmental goods contribute to the SDGs in developing countries?

How does global trade in environmental goods contribute to the SDGs in developing countries?

Broader applicability of the metacoupling framework than Tobler’s first law of geography for global sustainability: A systematic review

Double-edged sword: China’s free trade agreements reinforces embodied greenhouse gas transfers in agricultural products

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About