Globalization, Peace & Stability, Governance, and Knowledge Economy

Abstract

A previous analysis of the impact of formal institutions on the knowledge economy of 22 MiddleEastern and Sub-Sahara African countries during the 1996-2010 time period concluded that formal institutions were necessary, but inadequate, determinants of the knowledge economy. To extend that study, this paper claims that globalization induces peace and stability, which affects governance and through governance the knowledge economy. The claim addresses one weakness of previous research that did not consider the effects on the knowledge economy of globalization.We model the proposition as a three-stage process in four hypotheses, and estimate each hypothesis using robust estimators that are capable of dealing with the usual statistical problems without sacrificing economic relevance and significance. The results indicate that globalization has varying effects on peace and stability, and peace and stability affect governance differently depending on what kind of globalization induces it. For instance, the effects on governance induced by globalization defined as trade are stronger than those resulting from globalization taken to be foreign direct investment. Hence, we conclude that foreign direct investment is not a powerful mechanism for stimulating and sustaining the knowledge economy in our sample of countries. However, since globalization-induced peace and stability have both positive and negative effects on governance simultaneously, we also conclude that while the prospect for knowledge economy in African countries is dim, it is still realistic and attainable as long as these countries continue to engage in the kind of globalization that does indeed induce peace and stability. We further conclude that there is a need for a sharper focus on economic and institutional governance than on general governance as one possible extension of this paper.

The Evolving Debate on the Effect of Foreign Aid on Corruption and Institutions in Africa

“…In essence, whereas corruption has been used as the principal endogenous variable, governance is employed in the title. Asongu (2014c) has been consistent with Kaufmann et al (2010) and recent literature (Andrés & Asongu, 2013;Andrés et al, 2014;Amavilah et al, 2014) …”

Economic Implications of Business Dynamics for KE-Associated Economic Growth and Inclusive Development in African Countries

“…This also supports a clarification by Amavilah et al (2014) of Andrés et al (2014) on the positive role of institutions in KE-related development when more factors are taken into account. Among other studies on institutions, Oluwatobi et al (2014) have recently established that government effectiveness and regulation quality are the most relevant for growth enhancing innovations.…”

The Role of Openness in the Effect of ICT on Governance

“…Globalisation is approximated by trade (imports plus exports of commodities) and financial (foreign direct investment inflows) openness. The rationale for the choice of these measurements of globalisation is consistent with perception in the existing literature that trade and financial transactions are intuitively connected with ICT (see Amavilah et al, 2014;Asongu, 2014a). A potential weakness of the adopted indicators of trade and financial openness lies in the fact that they are skewed in favour of macroeconomic dimensions.…”