2011
DOI: 10.1108/10569211111144364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Globalization of small islands: the role models of Curaçao

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to compare the case of Curaçao, as a small island coping with globalization, with Singapore, Barbados, New Zealand, Ireland, and Aruba and to contribute to the development of a framework for discussing globalization and economic development strategies for small islands.Design/methodology/approachThe study and the paper follow the inductive line of reasoning, starting by comparing the current situation of six countries – Singapore, Barbados, New Zealand, Ireland, Aruba, and C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The weight of research that references Kotter's work does not investigate how the Process can be used, but instead either discusses Kotter's writing in the context of the broader literature on Change Management, or uses the Process as a framework for conducting a post-hoc analysis of a change (e.g. Yauch and Steudel 2002;Sidorko, 2008;Smith 2011;Casey et al 2012;Nitta et al 2009;Goede 2011;Gupta 2011). Cole et al (2006, p.363) and Paper et al (2001, p.85) have found the actual execution of a change to be one of the key factors in determining success or failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weight of research that references Kotter's work does not investigate how the Process can be used, but instead either discusses Kotter's writing in the context of the broader literature on Change Management, or uses the Process as a framework for conducting a post-hoc analysis of a change (e.g. Yauch and Steudel 2002;Sidorko, 2008;Smith 2011;Casey et al 2012;Nitta et al 2009;Goede 2011;Gupta 2011). Cole et al (2006, p.363) and Paper et al (2001, p.85) have found the actual execution of a change to be one of the key factors in determining success or failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%