2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.topol.2004.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Globalization of confluent partial actions on topological and metric spaces

Abstract: We generalize Exel's notion of partial group action to monoids. For partial monoid actions that can be defined by means of suitably well-behaved systems of generators and relations, we employ classical rewriting theory in order to describe the universal induced global action on an extended set. This universal action can be lifted to the setting of topological spaces and continuous maps, as well as to that of metric spaces and non-expansive maps. Well-known constructions such as Shimrat's homogeneous extension … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
60
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(24 reference statements)
2
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The notion of partial monoid action previously adopted by Megrelishvili and Schröder [12] is precisely that of Definition 2.4. Whenever we need to emphasise the distinction between the partial actions of Definitions 2.2 and 2.4, we will refer to the former as a weak partial action.…”
Section: Partial Monoid Actions and Premorphismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The notion of partial monoid action previously adopted by Megrelishvili and Schröder [12] is precisely that of Definition 2.4. Whenever we need to emphasise the distinction between the partial actions of Definitions 2.2 and 2.4, we will refer to the former as a weak partial action.…”
Section: Partial Monoid Actions and Premorphismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was one of the approaches taken for partial group actions by Kellendonk and Lawson and was subsequently generalised to partial monoid actions by Megrelishvili and Schröder [12]. An important difference between the methods of [10] and [12] is the fact that Kellendonk and Lawson define their 'globalisation' in terms of generators, whilst Megrelishvili and Schröder do not. We will compromise between these two methods by describing the 'globalisation' of a partial monoid action in terms of generators.…”
Section: Globalisation Of Partial Monoid Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations