Globalization and the Reform of Faculties of Education in Egypt: The Roles of Individual and Organizational, National and International Actors

Abstract

In this paper we outline the history of institutionalizing pre-service teacher education in Egypt, and then examine efforts in the mid-1990s to the mid-2000s to reform faculties of education. We document previous criticisms of and proposed changes in teacher preparation programs, but note that concerted reform efforts occurred only after the Egyptian government in the 1990s focused on improving educational quality, including teacher preparation, and the World Bank and USAID also put the issue pre-service teacher education on their agendas – and committed funds for this purpose. We also describe how the proposed reforms of policy and practice (e.g., improving assessments of entrants and graduates, increasing a focus on practice versus theory in coursework, expanding the amount of time devoted to field experiences, and organizing “induction” programs to support and guide new teachers) reflected global teacher education reform discourses characteristic of the 1990s and 2000s. However, rather than treating globalization as a process without real actors, we trace how these ideas were promoted by many Egyptians and non-Egyptians (e.g., faculty of education staff and Ministry of Higher Education personnel, but also World Bank staff, USAID personnel, and members of the two international organization-funded project teams). In examining the planning and implementation of two internationally funded faculty of education reform projects, we explore the interplay between and among local and global actors and identify individual and organizational factors that enabled or constrained these efforts to achieve significant and sustainable improvements in the quality of pre-service teacher education in Egypt.

The Teaching Professions and Globalization: A Scoping Review of the Anglophone Research Literature

“…This lacuna is intriguing, since our findings indicate a strengthened focus from the 2000s onward on teacher policy formation, the actors involved, and globalizing governance arrangements (e.g., Robertson 2012), involving national donor agencies and the World Bank (e.g., Ginsburg and Megahed 2011), EU (e.g., Henriksson 2014), the OECD PISA and TALIS programs (e.g., Rinne and Ozga 2013), and private sector edu-business (e.g., Mahony et al 2004). The three organizational studies about the OECD thus employ political economy-centered globalization theories, including one in combination with WC theory (Fraser and Smith 2017).…”

Based on the Cultivation of Fruit Trees to Carry Out the Research and Creation of Basic Education for Rural Teachers

“…In skill education, "project" can be a task of producing a specific product or an operational course. Therefore, the setting of "project-based" teaching content is the key to the implementation of project-based teaching method [14].…”

Globalization and Educational Reform in Kazakhstan

“…Among social scientists, globalization is employed in rather vague terms in reference to the economic, political, social, and cultural changes taking place in the world (Kim, 2005;Lindahl, 2006). However, the most obvious tendency to note is the frequent debate that globalization typically pertains to incursions of the advanced knowledge-based economies on the economies, society, politics, and culture of the developing and emerging countries (Beech, 2009;Ginsburg & Megahed, 2013;Komatsu, 2013;Marginson & Molli, 2001;Robertson & Dale, 2015). Marginson and Molli (2001) come to the conclusion that globalization is not simply an economic imperative:…”