Globalization and extraterritorial application of economic regulation: crisis in international law and balancing interests

Bagheri, Mohammad; Jahromi, Mohammad Jafar Ghanbari

doi:10.1007/s10657-012-9351-2

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 54 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As argued in Crettez (2014), countries adapt their systems to reduce the cost of institutional diversity. However, they are also predicted to be more willing to implement the requirements that are consistent with their institutional framework (Legrand 1996), and indeed, diversity may lead to regulatory conflicts across member states' oversight systems (Bagheri & Jahromi 2014). In the following sections, we provide a comparative overview of the oversight systems adopted and formulate hypotheses on why some countries may lag in this harmonization process.…”

Section: Insert Table 2 About Herementioning

confidence: 99%

Public oversight systems for statutory auditors in the European Union

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We provide a comparative overview of the process of implementation, harmonization and stabilization of public oversight systems for statutory auditors across the European Union (EU) after Directive 2006/43/EC. We build on institutional change theory to identify potential determinants as to why some countries still lag in this harmonization process.Oversight systems are a key institutional factor to guarantee the quality of financial information, essential to maintain investors' confidence and deep and stable capital markets.Thus, the harmonization of these systems has long been an objective of the EU. Our analyses serve to identify, analyse and compare how EU countries have incorporated European-wide requirements into their national legal systems. Particularly, we study: (1) basic characteristics of the system and bodies for public oversight, (2) organizational structure, (3) financing (4) transparency, (5) supervisory, and (6) disciplinary mechanisms. We show that significant diversity still exists across systems and that both the incentives for institutional change and the distance between pre-existing systems and the Directive are important explanatory factors of the achieved level of harmonization.

show abstract

Section: Insert Table 2 About Herementioning

confidence: 99%

Public oversight systems for statutory auditors in the European Union

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Environmental Due Diligence Obligations in Home State Law with Regard to Transnational Value Chains

Krebs¹

2022

Corporate Liability for Transboundary Environmental Harm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The following chapter takes a closer look at transboundary environmental harm caused by business operations in the context of transnational value chains. Here, the transboundary character does not necessarily result from the environmental harm’s course but rather from transboundary economic causal links via transnational value chains. Consequently, the situations considered in this chapter are generally those categorised as one of the ‘type-two cases’ detailed in the previous chapter.

show abstract

Blocking Statutes: Private Individuals Entangled in Interstate Conflicts

Gernert

2022

Blurry Boundaries of Public and Private International Law

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Globalization and extraterritorial application of economic regulation: crisis in international law and balancing interests

Cited by 5 publications

References 54 publications

Public oversight systems for statutory auditors in the European Union

Public oversight systems for statutory auditors in the European Union

Environmental Due Diligence Obligations in Home State Law with Regard to Transnational Value Chains

Blocking Statutes: Private Individuals Entangled in Interstate Conflicts

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About