Globalization and Marginality in Geographical Space 2017
DOI: 10.4324/9781315196183-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Globalization and economic marginalization: North-South differences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By focusing on unequal relations of power (Di Nunzio, 2019) at different scales (Loubere, 2018), we can better understand the current state of marginalised groups and the processes that got them there, and identify the multisystemic and dimensional challenges to be addressed at different scales to better support marginalised groups' diverse development pathways. Although some scholars have long acknowledged the importance of studying marginality at different scales (Déry, 2010; Gurung & Kollmair, 2005; Leimgruber, 2010), most existing case studies focus only on one scale, whether it be local (Friederichsen & Neef, 2010; Haldar & Abraham, 2015; Sutradhar, 2015), national (Husmann, 2016; Messerli et al, 2015; Timsina, 2002; Zulfiqar et al, 2014) or global (Nshimbi, 2009; Sommers et al, 2001), although exceptions exist (Andriesse et al, 2020; Déry, 2010). Further, the temporal scale is also lacking in frameworks on marginality in development (von Braun & Gatzweiler, 2014), even though marginality is not static, but changes over time (Déry et al, 2019; Gurung & Kollmair, 2005).…”
Section: Integrated Asset–access Framework For Analysing Marginalisat...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By focusing on unequal relations of power (Di Nunzio, 2019) at different scales (Loubere, 2018), we can better understand the current state of marginalised groups and the processes that got them there, and identify the multisystemic and dimensional challenges to be addressed at different scales to better support marginalised groups' diverse development pathways. Although some scholars have long acknowledged the importance of studying marginality at different scales (Déry, 2010; Gurung & Kollmair, 2005; Leimgruber, 2010), most existing case studies focus only on one scale, whether it be local (Friederichsen & Neef, 2010; Haldar & Abraham, 2015; Sutradhar, 2015), national (Husmann, 2016; Messerli et al, 2015; Timsina, 2002; Zulfiqar et al, 2014) or global (Nshimbi, 2009; Sommers et al, 2001), although exceptions exist (Andriesse et al, 2020; Déry, 2010). Further, the temporal scale is also lacking in frameworks on marginality in development (von Braun & Gatzweiler, 2014), even though marginality is not static, but changes over time (Déry et al, 2019; Gurung & Kollmair, 2005).…”
Section: Integrated Asset–access Framework For Analysing Marginalisat...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies on this subject, terms such as: conflict areas, scarcity areas, depressive areas, difficult areas, areas of production reserves, disadvantaged areas, areas of threats, areas lagging behind in development, less developed areas, and marginal or peripheral areas, are used interchangeably. In many cases, they are treated as synonyms of the term "problem area" [19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. However, their connotation is different, and such free use of the concepts may lead to many misunderstandings, and even serious errors.…”
Section: Genesis Problems and Social Challenges Of Problem Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%