1998
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0297.00354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Globalisation and the Rise in Labour Market Inequalities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
163
0
6

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 297 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(65 reference statements)
6
163
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Özler (2000) builds upon this strand of the literature by using plant-level data for the period 1983-1985 from the Turkish manufacturing sector and shows that the female share of employment in a plant increases with the export to total output ratio of its sector. In line with the arguments above, she notes that women are often employed in low-skill and low-paid jobs and especially among those establishments where investment in machinery and equipment leads to a decline in the female employment share, thus pointing to dynamic long-run effects disadvantageous to a feminization of the labor force (in this context, see also Wood, 1998 andSeguino, 2000). This suggests, globalization may first lead to an expansion of femaleintensive sectors which then rationalize production by investment and technological progress.…”
Section: Review Of the Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 63%
“…Özler (2000) builds upon this strand of the literature by using plant-level data for the period 1983-1985 from the Turkish manufacturing sector and shows that the female share of employment in a plant increases with the export to total output ratio of its sector. In line with the arguments above, she notes that women are often employed in low-skill and low-paid jobs and especially among those establishments where investment in machinery and equipment leads to a decline in the female employment share, thus pointing to dynamic long-run effects disadvantageous to a feminization of the labor force (in this context, see also Wood, 1998 andSeguino, 2000). This suggests, globalization may first lead to an expansion of femaleintensive sectors which then rationalize production by investment and technological progress.…”
Section: Review Of the Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 63%
“…34 Some agree with Adrian Wood (1994Wood ( , 1998 that trade is to blame for much of the observed wage widening. Others reject this conclusion, arguing that most or all of the widening is due to a shift in technology that has been strongly biased in favor of higher-skill occupational groups (Lawrence and Slaughter 1993;Berman, Bound and Griliches 1994).…”
Section: What Widened American Wage Gaps?mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Wage gaps seemed to fall when the three Asian tigers liberalized in the 1960s and early 1970s. Yet wage gaps generally widened when the six Latin American countries liberalized after the late 1970s (Wood 1994(Wood , 1997(Wood , 1998Feenstra and Hanson 1997;Robbins 1997;Robbins and Gindling 1999;Hanson and Harrison 1999). Why the difference?…”
Section: Some Latin and Asian Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aghion et al (2002) develop a model in which income inequality originates from the enlarged generality of new technologies. 2 Others ascribe income inequality to increased trade globalization (e.g., Wood, 1995Wood, , 1998) using the Heckscher-Ohlin model, in which skilled workers in advanced economies benefit from trade globalization while unskilled workers are disadvantaged. Indeed, the above explanations based on the models of skill-biased technological innovation and international trade are consistent with the recent increases in inequality in advanced economies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%