Globalisation and Market Orientation: A Challenge Within Reproductive Medicine

Werner-Felmayer, Gabriele

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-78670-4_2

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In particular, reproductive donation continues to receive critical attention for raising issues of potential conflicts of interest (COI) or "set of circumstances that creates a risk that professional judgement or actions regarding a primary interest will be unduly influenced by a secondary interest", 34 specifically concerning recipient, physicians, and Assisted Reproductive Technology clinics, and donors. 35 Moreover, regulations on fair transnational surrogacy are underdeveloped in countries where most surrogates come from. For instance, since Thai laws put restrictions on surrogacy, Thai surrogates who get impregnated in Laos go back to Thailand to carry the pregnancy and birth there.…”

Section: Bodily Autonomy and Conflict Of Interestmentioning

confidence: 99%

Whose autonomy, whose interests? A donor‐focused analysis of surrogacy and egg donation from the global South

Andal¹

2023

Developing World Bioethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article provides a donor‐focused analysis of how transnational reproductive donation intersects with issues central to bodily autonomy of surrogates and egg donors from the global South. Little is known about the autonomy of surrogates and egg donors, especially among those from the global South. This article addresses this gap by examining two key issues on surrogacy and egg donation—conflict of interest and recruitment market. With these issues, this paper presents contexts of the reproductive body as a space of contestation for autonomy. Analysis reveals that bodily autonomy is not an absolute entitlement available for surrogates and egg donors from the global South. Having bodily autonomy is a privileged disposition rather than a universal liberty for reproductive donors. The discussions in this work encourage further examination to understand the multi‐layered experiences of reproductive donors from the global South, towards deeper interrogation of the processes of reproductive industry.

show abstract

Section: Bodily Autonomy and Conflict Of Interestmentioning

confidence: 99%

Whose autonomy, whose interests? A donor‐focused analysis of surrogacy and egg donation from the global South

Andal¹

2023

Developing World Bioethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

La responsabilidad civil médica derivada de las molestias por la donación de óvulos

Puig Hernández

2023

Polít. soc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

En este trabajo estudiamos la doctrina del daño desproporcionado como método alternativo de compensación a las donantes de óvulos por las molestias padecidas. Para ello, debemos incidir en la responsabilidad civil derivada de una mala praxis médica. En el trabajo exponemos: las principales voces que desde la Antropología han denunciado que lo compensado no son el verdadero grueso de molestias relevantes; el estado vigente de la legislación y qué se permite compensar; y, finalmente, la compensación alternativa a través de esta doctrina recurriendo a precedentes judiciales, lo que nos llevará contextualizar las categorías doctrinales con las particularidades de la donación de óvulos.

show abstract

Globalisation and Market Orientation: A Challenge Within Reproductive Medicine

Cited by 2 publications

References 38 publications

Whose autonomy, whose interests? A donor‐focused analysis of surrogacy and egg donation from the global South

Whose autonomy, whose interests? A donor‐focused analysis of surrogacy and egg donation from the global South

La responsabilidad civil médica derivada de las molestias por la donación de óvulos

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About