2017
DOI: 10.3934/cpaa.2017090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global well-posedness of the two-dimensional horizontally filtered simplified Bardina turbulence model on a strip-like region

Abstract: We consider the 2D simplified Bardina turbulence model, with horizontal filtering, in an unbounded strip-like domain. We prove global existence and uniqueness of weak solutions in a suitable class of anisotropic weighted Sobolev spaces.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“….g., [5,6,12,14]) coupled with the stronger dissipation term −ν w, i.e. a full Laplacian appears instead of ν 2β w in (6) (and also in (9)).…”
Section: Remark 11 a Natural Domain For The Horizontal Filter A H Womentioning
confidence: 99%
“….g., [5,6,12,14]) coupled with the stronger dissipation term −ν w, i.e. a full Laplacian appears instead of ν 2β w in (6) (and also in (9)).…”
Section: Remark 11 a Natural Domain For The Horizontal Filter A H Womentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, we reach where we employed Hölder's and Young's inequalities. Now, we can use this last inequality to make explicit the terms, involving the spacederivatives of , needed to reach (6). To do so, we follow the same line of reasoning as in the proof of [28,Theorem 2.2].…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a wide range of -approximation models for the Navier-Stokes equations and for other related systems in fluid dynamics (see, for instance, [1,9,12,17,23], see also [6]). Further details can be found in [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we consider the approximate deconvolution model, introduced by Adams and Stolz (see also previous studies); by following this scheme, we approximate the filtered bilinear terms as follows: (vv)true‾(DN(bold-italicvtrue‾)DN(bold-italicvtrue‾))true¯and(φv)true‾(DN(φtrue‾)DN(bold-italicvtrue‾))true¯, where v and φ play the role of the variables u and θ , respectively, and the filtering operator G α is defined by the Helmholtz filter (see, eg, other studies; see also Bisconti and Catania for an analogous case involving an anisotropic horizontal filter), with truefalse(0.1em·0.1emfalse)=Gαfalse(0.1em·0.1emfalse) and G α :=( I − α 2 Δ) −1 . Here, D N is the deconvolution operator, which is constructed using the Van Cittert algorithm (see, eg, Lewandowski) and is formally defined by DN:=truen=0Nfalse(IGαfalse)n2.05482ptwith2.05482ptNdouble-struckN. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where v and play the role of the variables u and , respectively, and the filtering operator G is defined by the Helmholtz filter (see, eg, other studies [9][10][11][12] ; see also Bisconti and Catania 13,14 for an analogous case involving an anisotropic horizontal filter), with (·) = G (·) and G ∶= (I − 2 Δ) −1 . Here, D N is the deconvolution operator, which is constructed using the Van Cittert algorithm (see, eg, Lewandowski 10 ) and is formally defined by…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%