2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2014.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global well-posedness of strong solutions to the 3D primitive equations with horizontal eddy diffusivity

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper, we consider the initial-boundary value problem of the 3D primitive equations for oceanic and atmospheric dynamics with only horizontal diffusion in the temperature equation. Global well-posedness of strong solutions are established with H 2 initial data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
78
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(67 reference statements)
3
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The continuous dependence on the initial data, in particular the uniqueness, are straightforward corollary of Proposition 2.4 in [6]. This completes the proof.…”
Section: A Priori H 2 Estimates and Global Well-posednesssupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The continuous dependence on the initial data, in particular the uniqueness, are straightforward corollary of Proposition 2.4 in [6]. This completes the proof.…”
Section: A Priori H 2 Estimates and Global Well-posednesssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Due to the same reasons to those explained in [5,6], system (1.8)-(1.14) defined on Ω 0 is equivalent to the following system defined on Ω := M × (−h, h): Not that the restriction on the sub-domain Ω 0 of a solution (v, w, p, T ) to system (1.15)-(1.21) is a solution to the original system (1.8)-(1.14). Because of this, throughout this paper, we mainly concern on the study of system (1.15)-(1.21) defined on Ω, while the well-posedness results for system (1.8)-(1.14) defined on Ω 0 follow as a corollary of those for system (1.15)-(1.21).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…According to the weight in the vertical diffusion terms, we also introduce the weighted norms 4 be nonnegative and let the given velocity field (v h , ω) satisfy the above assumptions (2.8)-(2.11). Then, for any (arbitrarily large) T ∈ (0, ∞), there exists a unique nonnegative solution (T, q v , q c , q r ), with initial value (T 0 , q v0 , q c0 , q r0 ), of the boundary value problem (1.25)-…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposition 3.2. Let T ∈ (0, ∞) and (T, q v , q c , q r ) be a solution to (1.25)-(1.30) in M × (0, T ) subject to the boundary conditions (2.5)-(2.7) with non-negative intial data 4 , satisfying the regularities stated in Proposition 3.1 by replacing T 0 with T . Then for every t…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ν H > 0 and ν 3 > 0) and only partial anisotropic vertical diffusion (i.e. κ H = 0 and κ 3 > 0) which stands for the vertical eddy heat diffusivity turbulence mixing coefficient; see also [8] for the case when ν H > 0, ν 3 > 0, κ H > 0 and κ 3 = 0, and [9] for the case when ν H > 0, κ H > 0 and ν 3 = 0, κ 3 = 0 (see, e.g., [16], [17], for the geophysical justification). In the above results, the Coriolis forcing term, with rotation parameter R, did not play any role in proving the global regularity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%