2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-007-0243-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Well-Posedness for the KP-I Equation on the Background of a Non-Localized Solution

Abstract: Abstract. We prove that the Cauchy problem for the KP-I equation is globally well-posed for initial data which are localized perturbations (of arbitrary size) of a non-localized (i.e. not decaying in all directions) traveling wave solution (e.g. the KdV line solitary wave or the Zaitsev solitary waves which are localized in x and y periodic or conversely).

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
45
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(71 reference statements)
5
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, for the KP-I equation, a conserved higher-order energy functional has been constructed in [24,25]. After transforming this quantity to the variables used in the KP-II equation Similarly to F (u), the y-independent part of H(u) is equivalent to the higher-order energy functional H(u) of the KdV equation (1.2) given by (4.16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, for the KP-I equation, a conserved higher-order energy functional has been constructed in [24,25]. After transforming this quantity to the variables used in the KP-II equation Similarly to F (u), the y-independent part of H(u) is equivalent to the higher-order energy functional H(u) of the KdV equation (1.2) given by (4.16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The self-adjoint operator L is related to the Hessian operator of the standard energy functional expanded at the periodic traveling wave. Similarly, the self-adjoint operator K can be found from the Hessian operator of a higher-order energy functional, as for instance the one used in the proof of global well-posedness for the KP-I equation [24,25]. Then the operators JL and JK commute.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a proof of this lemma, we refer to [2,30] or [23] (Lemma 2, p. 783). The proof on [23] is performed for functions on R 2 but the proof works equally well in the R x × T y setting.…”
Section: Lemma 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof on [23] is performed for functions on R 2 but the proof works equally well in the R x × T y setting. In order to motivate the mKP-II equation, we now introduce the Miura transforms that we use in this paper.…”
Section: Lemma 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to our study of the Cauchy problem for the ZK equation in H s × . A second possibility (which has been carried out in [13] for similar problems for the KP-I equation) is to consider two-dimensional "localized" perturbations of the one-dimensional solution . This motivates the study of the Cauchy problem (1.5) below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%