2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00222-006-0020-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global well-posedness for the critical 2D dissipative quasi-geostrophic equation

Abstract: We give an elementary proof of the global well-posedness for the critical 2D dissipative quasi-geostrophic equation. The argument is based on a non-local maximum principle involving appropriate moduli of continuity.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
580
1
11

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 450 publications
(596 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
580
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, two remarkable and quite different proofs of global existence in the critical case have been obtained. In one ( [92]) the result is one of global persistence of regularity, based on a new and promising idea, a maximum modulus of continuity principle. The other proof ( [21]) uses harmonic extension to prove a gain of regularity of weak solutions, in the spirit of the De Giorgi, from L 2 to L ∞ , from L ∞ to Hölder continuous, and beyond.…”
Section: Weak Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, two remarkable and quite different proofs of global existence in the critical case have been obtained. In one ( [92]) the result is one of global persistence of regularity, based on a new and promising idea, a maximum modulus of continuity principle. The other proof ( [21]) uses harmonic extension to prove a gain of regularity of weak solutions, in the spirit of the De Giorgi, from L 2 to L ∞ , from L ∞ to Hölder continuous, and beyond.…”
Section: Weak Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And there are applications in Fluid Mechanics, cf. [29,45] and the references therein. An extensive list of current applications is contained in the survey paper [37].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking the gradient with respect to x for equation (1.1), we have It is noticed that the classical quasi-geostrophic equation takes the same form (cf. [6,5,8], etc. ): .…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%