2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.anihpc.2013.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global well-posedness and exponential decay rates for a KdV–Burgers equation with indefinite damping

Abstract: We consider the KdV-Burgers equation u t + u xxx − u xx + λu + uu x = 0 and its linearized version u t + u xxx − u xx + λu = 0 on the whole real line. We investigate their well-posedness their exponential stability when λ is an indefinite damping.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(22 reference statements)
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We define Proof. The same result was obtained for the generalized KdV and the KdV-Burgers equations in [19] and [7], respectively. Since the proof is analogous and follows from classical arguments we omit it.…”
Section: Case 1 ≤ P <supporting
confidence: 80%
“…We define Proof. The same result was obtained for the generalized KdV and the KdV-Burgers equations in [19] and [7], respectively. Since the proof is analogous and follows from classical arguments we omit it.…”
Section: Case 1 ≤ P <supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Compare this result with the one-dimensional case from [4] (in fact, the present paper is inspired by that one), where the initial value problem is considered for damped Korteweg-de Vries-Burgers equation…”
Section: Introduction Description Of Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…We are concerned with an initial-boundary value problem (IBVP) for the two-dimensional Zakharov-Kuznetsov-Burgers (ZKB) equation which includes dissipation and dispersion and has been studied by various researchers due to its applications in Mechanics and Physics [1,2,3]. One can find extensive bibliography and sharp results on decay rates of solutions to the Cauchy problem (IVP) for (1.2) in [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%