2011
DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2010.508011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Web Accessibility Analysis of National Government Portals and Ministry Web Sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
31
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This includes US federal web sites [34,35], US state web sites [36][37][38][39][40], UK government web sites [41], and Chinese government web sites [42]. One of the first multi-national evaluations of government web site accessibility confirmed that it continues to be a problem, regardless of country [43]. Because of the continuing problem of inaccessible government content in the European Union (it has been estimated that only 1/3 of EU government web sites are fully accessible), the EU proposed on Dec 12, 2012, that new regulations be adopted to require accessible government web sites by the end of 2015.…”
Section: Why You Need Access To the Same Contentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This includes US federal web sites [34,35], US state web sites [36][37][38][39][40], UK government web sites [41], and Chinese government web sites [42]. One of the first multi-national evaluations of government web site accessibility confirmed that it continues to be a problem, regardless of country [43]. Because of the continuing problem of inaccessible government content in the European Union (it has been estimated that only 1/3 of EU government web sites are fully accessible), the EU proposed on Dec 12, 2012, that new regulations be adopted to require accessible government web sites by the end of 2015.…”
Section: Why You Need Access To the Same Contentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…El tercer paso supone la elaboración de un libro de códigos en el que se describa cómo medir cada aspecto de interés, o variable. Por tanto, el codebook está integrado por un total de 49 ítems (anexados, de forma esquemática, al final del trabajo) relativos a la apariencia audiovisual, la Arquitectura de la Información (AI), la Web 2.0, la usabilidad, la accesibilidad y la (percepción de) calidad; y que se fundamentan en otras investigaciones precedentes (Beerli;Martín, 2004;Evans-Cowley, 2006;Goodwin et al, 2011; Martínez-Rolán; Piñeiro-Otero; Baamonde-Silva, 2016; Huertas; Míguez-González; Lozano-Monterrubio, 2017; Soares; Amaral; Ferreira, 2017). En relación al estudio más semejante (Piñeiro-Naval; Igartua; Marañón, 2017) al actual, cabe afirmar que el libro de códigos ha cambiado porque la red también lo ha hecho, requiriendo una necesaria adaptación de las herramientas de pesquisa a los dinámicos entornos interactivos (Karpf, 2012).…”
Section: Muestra Y Categorías De Análisisunclassified
“…The second type of indicator relied on evidence of 'process', in the efforts by EU Member One symbolic approach to indicators of investment in access, applied in other studies, is to sample key government websites for their accessibility to disabled people (Goodwin et al, 2011). This can be applied similarly to public websites of relevance to political participation.…”
Section: Process: Efforts To Secure Political Participation Rights Inmentioning
confidence: 99%