2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global value chains, large-scale farming, and poverty: Long-term effects in Senegal

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, concentrating on self-employment activities such as artisan work and petty trade, the RLD literature has neglected to study rural employment. This is unfortunate, as rural employment in, for example, the LSF sector, may be better at providing rural people with a steady income compared with the often volatile income that self-employment activities offer (see Van den Broeck, Swinnen, & Maertens, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, concentrating on self-employment activities such as artisan work and petty trade, the RLD literature has neglected to study rural employment. This is unfortunate, as rural employment in, for example, the LSF sector, may be better at providing rural people with a steady income compared with the often volatile income that self-employment activities offer (see Van den Broeck, Swinnen, & Maertens, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, whether and to what extent these investments turn out to benefit host countries critically hinges on the potential for employment creation, particularly for those who lose their land without compensation. Although past experiences with large farms have been largely negative, recent changes in the context conditions have given reason to believe that large farms may have a future (Deininger & Byerlee, 2012) and may actually contribute to increased welfare and poverty reduction due to employment creation (Deininger & Xia, 2016;Herrmann, 2017;Van den Broeck, Swinnen, & Maertens, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model (4) shows that the influence coefficient of male farmers participating in procurement on multidimensional poverty is −0.596 if men acquire, while model (10) shows that the same of female farmers participating in procurement on multidimensional poverty is −0.575. This indicates that the poverty reduction effect of male farmers is greater than that of female farmers.…”
Section: Heterogeneity Of Multidimensional Poverty Reduction Effect Of Smallholders' Participation In the Agricultural Value Chain In Difmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the sector is also responsible for providing working opportunities in terms of both agricultural and nonagricultural supportive employment opportunities. Amid swift trends of expansion and economic divergence, remain supportive for quantifying utmost employment opportunities for more than 60% of the overall inhabitants and generates 27% of the gross national product within South-Asian nations [3,4]. Moreover, agriculture remains a vital mechanism for long-term growth and poverty alleviation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%