2017
DOI: 10.1111/twec.12595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global value chain and its impact on the linkage between exchange rate and export: Cases of China, Japan and Korea

Abstract: The link between exchange rate and trade has been studied for a long time, but there is no consensus about their relation. This paper tests the old argument, whether depreciation of real effective exchange rates (REERs) raises exports. We differentiate the test with earlier studies by employing a new measurement of REER and incorporating the effect of GVCs. We measured REER at industry level with value‐added trade weights. We analysed the topic with LSDV and system GMM for China, Japan and Korea since these co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the coefficients of EX are not significant in the higher quantiles, the results in the lower and medium quantiles are consistent with previous evidence of the significant negative association between the ASI and EX. Given the Korean won/US dollar rate, a positive (negative) change indicates the depreciation (appreciation) of the Korean won (Bang & Park, 2018;Kim & Kim, 2017). IP has a significantly positive link with the ASI in all quantiles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although the coefficients of EX are not significant in the higher quantiles, the results in the lower and medium quantiles are consistent with previous evidence of the significant negative association between the ASI and EX. Given the Korean won/US dollar rate, a positive (negative) change indicates the depreciation (appreciation) of the Korean won (Bang & Park, 2018;Kim & Kim, 2017). IP has a significantly positive link with the ASI in all quantiles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The researchers speculated that growing fragmentations in the production process had weakened the effect of exchange rate changes on regional trade in Asia. Furthermore, Bang & Park (2018) proved that participation in GVC decreased the exchange rate elasticity of exports in South Korea by 33%. However, the effect was not statistically significant for Japan and China.…”
Section: Traditional Model (Such As Thementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Industry-level data are preferable to aggregate-level data to avoid bias due to heterogeneity in each sector. Several previous studies have also used an industry-level analysis, such asSato et al (2016) andBang & Park (2018). Industry classification at the 2-digit ISIC Rev.4 was chosen based on the availability of data in the Inter-Country Input-Output (ICIO) tables(OECD, 2018b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the input variation may de facto influence the input structure of each input demand system. There are abundant literatures that employ diverse notions to quantify the input variation, for instance, elasticity, robustness and resilience (Bang & Park, 2018; Bombarda & Marcassa, 2020; Keil, 2023). Previous scholars proved that the notion of input elasticity is a direct method to quantify the variation of one specific imported input relative to the aggregate input demand system (Egger et al., 2021; Timmer et al., 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%