2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.physd.2011.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global uniform symptotic attractive stability of the non-autonomous bouncing ball system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first one consists of a mechanical system capturing the dynamics of a simple robotic manipulator that is required to interact physically with the environment through the effect of a control input affecting the continuous dynamics (see also [24], [25], [15,Section 7.3], [13, Section 6.5]) . The second application pertains to the bouncing ball system [26] with a control input affecting the impacts (see also [27], [28], [29] and [30], [31] [32] where stabilization and, respectively, trajectory tracking for the so-called juggling systems, namely mechanical systems controlled at impacts, has been addressed, and [33] where the stability of a controlled bouncing ball system is studied using Lyapunov-like techniques). Classical passivity-based control techniques such as passivation by feedback, energy shaping and damping injection are also applied to the two applications to illustrate their effectiveness in the hybrid systems setting.…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first one consists of a mechanical system capturing the dynamics of a simple robotic manipulator that is required to interact physically with the environment through the effect of a control input affecting the continuous dynamics (see also [24], [25], [15,Section 7.3], [13, Section 6.5]) . The second application pertains to the bouncing ball system [26] with a control input affecting the impacts (see also [27], [28], [29] and [30], [31] [32] where stabilization and, respectively, trajectory tracking for the so-called juggling systems, namely mechanical systems controlled at impacts, has been addressed, and [33] where the stability of a controlled bouncing ball system is studied using Lyapunov-like techniques). Classical passivity-based control techniques such as passivation by feedback, energy shaping and damping injection are also applied to the two applications to illustrate their effectiveness in the hybrid systems setting.…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…x, 0)) = 0 (33) for some r ≥ 0. Due to detectability relative to the set (27), every solution starting from and staying in (33) converges to A. Moreover, since V is positive definite with respect to A, the only invariant set in (33) is for r = 0.…”
Section: Basic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding ball motion is called the P 1 1 -orbit, where we adopt the nomenclature from [9]. The orbit P k l denotes a periodic ball motion where the ball impacts with the paddle l times per In order for a P k 1 -orbit to be stable, its nominal impact must occur during the interval where the paddle decelerates withp = −g/2, i.e.…”
Section: A Periodic Orbitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bouncing balls exhibit rich dynamical behavior, which has been well studied, see, for example, [8], [9]. One such behavior is that the ball trajectories are chaotic for a specific higher frequency paddle motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2(a). This notation means that the ball motion has a period of 2 vibration cycles and describes one kind of trajectory during the orbit [27]. Out of this region, a chaotic dynamics prevails.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%