2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of MELCOR and TRACE critical flow models against MARVIKEN tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was earlier discussed by Mosunova in reference [25] and by the code developers in MELCOR Manual [1,2]. The code calculates the subcooled liquid choking flow with the Henry-Fauske model and gas choking flow with reasonable accuracy, comparable to the results achieved by the TRACE code [23,24]. The main problem exists for a critical two-phase flow that is modeled by the Moody model based on the RE-TRAN code implementation [1][2][3]23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It was earlier discussed by Mosunova in reference [25] and by the code developers in MELCOR Manual [1,2]. The code calculates the subcooled liquid choking flow with the Henry-Fauske model and gas choking flow with reasonable accuracy, comparable to the results achieved by the TRACE code [23,24]. The main problem exists for a critical two-phase flow that is modeled by the Moody model based on the RE-TRAN code implementation [1][2][3]23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The code calculates the subcooled liquid choking flow with the Henry-Fauske model and gas choking flow with reasonable accuracy, comparable to the results achieved by the TRACE code [23,24]. The main problem exists for a critical two-phase flow that is modeled by the Moody model based on the RE-TRAN code implementation [1][2][3]23]. Future improvements in the MELCOR code will be necessary and are planned by developers [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations