Abstract:Available literature data on five typical groups of emerging contaminants (EMCs), i.e., chlorinated paraffins (CPs), dechlorane plus and related compounds (DPs), hexabromocyclododecanes (HBCDs), phthalate esters, and pyrethroids, accumulated between 2003 and 2013 were assimilated. Research efforts were categorized by environmental compartments and countries, so that global trends of research on EMCs and data gaps can be identified. The number of articles on the target EMCs ranged from 126 to 1,379 between 2003… Show more
“…The United States serves as an excellent case study on the multifaceted nature of governing toxic chemical risks. It has lagged behind the European Union in adopting the precautionary principle, especially with regards to importing consumer and industrial products (Becker 2010), and in dealing with emerging contaminants (Bao et al 2015). And, as elsewhere, partial solutions have led to unintended outcomes, such as increases in ozone exposure concomitant with declines in particulate pollution due to the widespread adoption of catalytic converter technology (HEI 2019).…”
AbstractOver 40 years of regulations in the United States have failed to protect human and environmental health. We contend that these failures result from the flawed governance over the continued production, use, and disposal of toxic chemicals. To address this failure, we need to identify the broader social, political, and technological processes producing, knowing, and regulating toxic chemicals, collectively referred to as toxic chemical governance. To do so, we create a conceptual framework covering five key domains of governance: knowledge production, policy design, monitoring and enforcement, evaluation, and adjudication. Within each domain, social actors of varying power negotiate what constitutes acceptable risk, creating longer-term path dependencies in how they are addressed (or not). Using existing literature and five case studies, we discuss four paths for improving governance: evolving paradigms of harm, addressing bias in the knowledge base, making governance more equitable, and overcoming path dependency.
“…The United States serves as an excellent case study on the multifaceted nature of governing toxic chemical risks. It has lagged behind the European Union in adopting the precautionary principle, especially with regards to importing consumer and industrial products (Becker 2010), and in dealing with emerging contaminants (Bao et al 2015). And, as elsewhere, partial solutions have led to unintended outcomes, such as increases in ozone exposure concomitant with declines in particulate pollution due to the widespread adoption of catalytic converter technology (HEI 2019).…”
AbstractOver 40 years of regulations in the United States have failed to protect human and environmental health. We contend that these failures result from the flawed governance over the continued production, use, and disposal of toxic chemicals. To address this failure, we need to identify the broader social, political, and technological processes producing, knowing, and regulating toxic chemicals, collectively referred to as toxic chemical governance. To do so, we create a conceptual framework covering five key domains of governance: knowledge production, policy design, monitoring and enforcement, evaluation, and adjudication. Within each domain, social actors of varying power negotiate what constitutes acceptable risk, creating longer-term path dependencies in how they are addressed (or not). Using existing literature and five case studies, we discuss four paths for improving governance: evolving paradigms of harm, addressing bias in the knowledge base, making governance more equitable, and overcoming path dependency.
“…These compounds appear in domestic and industrial wastewater because phthalate diesters readily leak from plastic goods, such as tableware, and may be discharged from plastic-producing industrial plants. Phthalate diesters are recalcitrant compounds and accumulate as environmental contaminants (1), and are suspected to be endocrinedisrupting chemicals (2,3). Reports describing developmental toxicity and teratogenic effects of these compounds on animals are increasing (4,5).…”
“…The most recent findings of ECs in the environment can be attributed to improvements in analytical instrumentation with new and improved equipment and techniques such as gas or liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry allowing to detect and quantify these new compounds at trace levels, opening a broad range of previously undetected pollutants present in different matrices including soil, water, food, tissue, blood and breast milk (Bao et al, 2015;Chefetz et al, 2008;Corcellas et al, 2012;Goldstein et al, 2014;Wingfors et al, 2005). Thus, it was how scientists started to be aware of a new family of contaminants that could be defined as follows:…”
Section: What Is An Emerging Contaminant?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This figure has been created summarizing until now the most important groups taken into account by different authors (Albero et al, 2015a;Bao et al, 2015;Eljarrat and Barceló, 2003;Jurado et al, 2012;Tadeo et al, 2012a;Verlicchi et al, 2010). Certainly this figure is not fixed and in next years, as the industry continues to develop new compounds, this list will include new ECs.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.