2022
DOI: 10.3386/w30524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Trends in Income Inequality and Income Dynamics: New Insights from GRID

Abstract: NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These rapid changes may have been particularly impactful for some, such as those already lacking economic resources (i.e., low socioeconomic status [SES]). While the lasting impact of COVID‐19 is uncertain, history indicates that economic decline hits hardest on those with greater economic insecurity (Guvenen, 2017).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These rapid changes may have been particularly impactful for some, such as those already lacking economic resources (i.e., low socioeconomic status [SES]). While the lasting impact of COVID‐19 is uncertain, history indicates that economic decline hits hardest on those with greater economic insecurity (Guvenen, 2017).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the sudden, unique influence of COVID‐19 on the Class of 2020, the current research sought to examine if students changed their academic and career goals during a crisis and identify resources that may promote goal persistence. As historical evidence suggests deepening inequality during global crises, this research aimed to identify the emergence of psychological signs of inequality by SES (Berube & Bateman, 2020; Guvenen, 2017; Taylor et al., 2010). Specifically, this research sought to determine if economically disadvantaged students were more likely to change their goals during a crisis when compared to their peers.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%