2007
DOI: 10.4071/1551-4897-4.4.186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global-to-Local Modeling and Experiment Investigation of HFCBGA Package Board-Level Solder Joint Reliability

Abstract: Due to the high speed and high I/O count requirements for semiconductor packages, thousands of soldered interconnections are indispensable, and this situation renders traditional finite element method (FEM) analysis a formidable challenge. This paper presents a 3D-equivalent global model and local submodeling technique to investigate board-level solder joint reliability under cyclic temperature loading. The equivalent global model is capable of addressing critical solder failure locations. An individual local … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig 4 illustrates some detailed components and simplifications in the FEM of the stack TSV package. The micro-bumps were considered an equivalent layer with underfill because a small portion of SAC in micro-bump and its equivalent material properties can be addressed by [12]. There are many approaches used by researcher in the modeling of fatigue, such as stressed-based, plastic-based, plastic/creep strain-based, energy-based, and damage accumulated-based.…”
Section: Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig 4 illustrates some detailed components and simplifications in the FEM of the stack TSV package. The micro-bumps were considered an equivalent layer with underfill because a small portion of SAC in micro-bump and its equivalent material properties can be addressed by [12]. There are many approaches used by researcher in the modeling of fatigue, such as stressed-based, plastic-based, plastic/creep strain-based, energy-based, and damage accumulated-based.…”
Section: Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%