2022
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2022.3225902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global to Local: A Hierarchical Detection Algorithm for Hyperspectral Image Target Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, innovative approaches have been integrated into classical methods to address limitations arising from model complexity. These include kernel methods [13], hierarchical structures [14][15][16], and fractional Fourier transforms [17]. To utilize in-scene spectra better, spectral unmixing techniques [18,19] and sparsity assumptions [20][21][22][23][24] are introduced to construct hyperspectral target detectors, which require certain assumptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, innovative approaches have been integrated into classical methods to address limitations arising from model complexity. These include kernel methods [13], hierarchical structures [14][15][16], and fractional Fourier transforms [17]. To utilize in-scene spectra better, spectral unmixing techniques [18,19] and sparsity assumptions [20][21][22][23][24] are introduced to construct hyperspectral target detectors, which require certain assumptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, water bodies are characterized by multiple scales and shapes, varying greatly in spatial and geometric scales, which influences the extraction results. Moreover, their spectral information in RSIs is complex [10] and susceptible to interference from glaciers, clouds, and shadows. In summary, mapping water body boundaries accurately can be difficult, which may limit the accuracy of water body extraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former introduces multiple 2D branches to extract multi-scale spatial information from the features generated by 3D convolutions in each block (see Figure 2d), and the latter adds one 2D unit after every 3D unit to concentrate on spatial features (Figure 2c). Recently, graph-based methods have been applied to many tasks in hyperspectral image processing, such as classification [22][23][24], clustering [25][26][27], target detection [28], and anomaly detection [29], and have achieved good performance. However, existing 3D HSISR models are very simple and plain, and they are not combined with some advanced inventions of deep learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%