1996
DOI: 10.2172/527485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global terrestrial biogeochemistry: Perturbations, interactions, and time scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 145 publications
(312 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proportion Interestingly, some of the difference in deposition was driven by of total global N deposition received by forests, which store large uncertainties in the biological sources. For all models, the sum of amounts of carbon in wood, varied between 5.3% (GRANTOUR) the sources did not equal total global deposition (higher in some and 10% (ECHAM) with IMAGES (6.6%), MOGUNTIA (8.9%), cases and lower in others) suggesting that N mass was not and GCTM ( f-h See Table 4 footnotes f-h. from 0.52 to 0.61 Gt C yr-• (Table 4) [Braswell, 1996;Schirnel, 1996].…”
Section: Sources Of Nomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proportion Interestingly, some of the difference in deposition was driven by of total global N deposition received by forests, which store large uncertainties in the biological sources. For all models, the sum of amounts of carbon in wood, varied between 5.3% (GRANTOUR) the sources did not equal total global deposition (higher in some and 10% (ECHAM) with IMAGES (6.6%), MOGUNTIA (8.9%), cases and lower in others) suggesting that N mass was not and GCTM ( f-h See Table 4 footnotes f-h. from 0.52 to 0.61 Gt C yr-• (Table 4) [Braswell, 1996;Schirnel, 1996].…”
Section: Sources Of Nomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is only the second study to explicitly consider the spatial distribution of nitrogen deposition on ecosystems [Townsend et al, 1996 However, there is much less year to year variability in the N deposition induced terrestrial carbon sink because we do not include interactions with climatic variability in our model. Recent terrestrial carbon sink is determined by interactions between the climate and the nitrogen cycle [Braswell, 1996;Schirnel, 1996].…”
Section: Relation Of This Study To Other Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%