2001
DOI: 10.1081/css-120000395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global synchrony in biospheric variations and influence on soil pH

Abstract: Data collected from 1968 through 1997 showed a globally synchronous annual increase in soil acidity during the period June through August which was highly correlated with progressively decreasing geomagnetic field strength despite periodic local alterations in electromagnetic activity at the planetary boundary layer. Monthly determinations of soil pH for periods of one or more years at sites in Australia, South America, North America, Scotland, and Germany showed pH values to be consistently and significantly … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, in a recent model (Khabarova et al, 2010) of biomass production within both deciduous and evergreen coniferous forests of northern Eurasia in response to incoming photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) plus geomagnetic variations over a 25-year period, the correlation between the cumulative PAR and biomass was significantly less when the cumulative annual Kp index values were omitted from the estimated radiation energy input. In such studies, variations in acidity ( pH) of the soil in response to variations in the Kp index have to be taken into account (Mullenax et al, 2001); Dubrov (1978) draws attention to relatively large variations in the rate of secretion of 'physiologically active substances' by roots into the soil and correspondingly large contemporaneous variations in the GMF. Therefore, in the wider environment, GMF variations, besides their possible direct effects on whole plant growth, may also affect growth indirectly, via alterations to soil chemistry and their consequent effects on root growth and function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, in a recent model (Khabarova et al, 2010) of biomass production within both deciduous and evergreen coniferous forests of northern Eurasia in response to incoming photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) plus geomagnetic variations over a 25-year period, the correlation between the cumulative PAR and biomass was significantly less when the cumulative annual Kp index values were omitted from the estimated radiation energy input. In such studies, variations in acidity ( pH) of the soil in response to variations in the Kp index have to be taken into account (Mullenax et al, 2001); Dubrov (1978) draws attention to relatively large variations in the rate of secretion of 'physiologically active substances' by roots into the soil and correspondingly large contemporaneous variations in the GMF. Therefore, in the wider environment, GMF variations, besides their possible direct effects on whole plant growth, may also affect growth indirectly, via alterations to soil chemistry and their consequent effects on root growth and function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%