2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global survey of healthcare practitioners’ beliefs and practices around intrauterine contraceptive method use in nulliparous women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
31
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results from the overall cohort (providers from 15 countries across 4 regions) have been published [16]. Here, we report a subgroup analysis of the responses from providers of contraception in Europe and Canada.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The results from the overall cohort (providers from 15 countries across 4 regions) have been published [16]. Here, we report a subgroup analysis of the responses from providers of contraception in Europe and Canada.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Lack of knowledge of Medical Eligibility Criteria (MEC) can lead to the application of inappropriate constraints on recommendations for contraception in adolescents, for example, the suitability of intrauterine contraception (IUC) in nulliparous women. [13,87,88] The situation can be exacerbated further by unwarranted delays around the timing of initiation of contraception, i.e., until the next menses or the receipt of results from STI screening. [89] Health care providers not only need to be able to proactively address common myths and misconceptions around the suitability and potential side effects of different contraceptive methods but also correct inaccurate perception of the frequency with which side effects occur.…”
Section: Health Care Professional Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[89] Health care providers not only need to be able to proactively address common myths and misconceptions around the suitability and potential side effects of different contraceptive methods but also correct inaccurate perception of the frequency with which side effects occur. [86][87][88]90] Accurate information regarding the relationship with hormonal contraception and certain cancers, including the well documented decrease in the risk of ovarian and endometrial cancers, should be provided. [90] In all countries, HCPs may need guidance in identifying situations where it is appropriate to explore the non-contraceptive benefits of hormonal methods, such as management of heavy menstrual bleeding, painful periods, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), or acne.…”
Section: Health Care Professional Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Political, religious, ethical, safety concerns, misconceptions, lack of healthcare provider knowledge or skills, low awareness of the benefits of LARC by women, and high upfront costs are major barriers. Many healthcare providers were found reluctant to provide intrauterine contraceptive device to nulliparous women or women post-abortion without knowing the evidence-based recommendations [18,19]. It very important that misconceptions about LARC are dispelled based on current evidence to increase the uptake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%