The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.12.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global stability of protein folding from an empirical free energy function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, 29 indices were calculated, comprising: 1–8) Eight indices associated with the dihedral angles, phi and psi, of the protein’s backbone (wPsiH, wPsiS, wPsiI, wPhiH, wPhiS, wPhiI, Phi, Psi); 9–10) The accessible surface area (A) and the superficiality index (wSp); 11) The buried non-polar area (ΔAnp); 12) A measure of the folding degree (lnFD) introduced in our previous report [41]; 13) The squared radius of the protein (wR2); 14–20) Seven contact-based indices (wNc, wFLC, wNLC, wCO, wLCO, wRWCO, wCTP), each one weighted with seven of the above mentioned amino acid properties (HP, ECI, IP, Z1, Z2, Z3, ISA), in order to distinguish contacts involving different residues; 21–29) Nine thermodynamic indices (Gw(F), Gs(F), W(F), ΔGs, HBd, ΔGel, ΔGw, ΔGLJ, ΔGtor) associated with the number of hydrogen bonds in the backbone of the protein and several empirical approaches capturing folding free energy contributions [42, 43] referring to Lenard-Jones and electrostatic interactions, torsion potential, superficial free energy, hydrophobic effect, etc. A summary of all the structure-based indices is presented in the Additional file 2: Tables SI-3 and SI-4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, 29 indices were calculated, comprising: 1–8) Eight indices associated with the dihedral angles, phi and psi, of the protein’s backbone (wPsiH, wPsiS, wPsiI, wPhiH, wPhiS, wPhiI, Phi, Psi); 9–10) The accessible surface area (A) and the superficiality index (wSp); 11) The buried non-polar area (ΔAnp); 12) A measure of the folding degree (lnFD) introduced in our previous report [41]; 13) The squared radius of the protein (wR2); 14–20) Seven contact-based indices (wNc, wFLC, wNLC, wCO, wLCO, wRWCO, wCTP), each one weighted with seven of the above mentioned amino acid properties (HP, ECI, IP, Z1, Z2, Z3, ISA), in order to distinguish contacts involving different residues; 21–29) Nine thermodynamic indices (Gw(F), Gs(F), W(F), ΔGs, HBd, ΔGel, ΔGw, ΔGLJ, ΔGtor) associated with the number of hydrogen bonds in the backbone of the protein and several empirical approaches capturing folding free energy contributions [42, 43] referring to Lenard-Jones and electrostatic interactions, torsion potential, superficial free energy, hydrophobic effect, etc. A summary of all the structure-based indices is presented in the Additional file 2: Tables SI-3 and SI-4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…i-1)Thermodynamics, which are novel physics-based indices designed to describe the main factors involved in protein folding stability [ 28 , 37 ]. These indices deal with residue-residue electronic interactions, Van der Waals interactions, dihedral torsion potential, backbone hydrogen bond formation, and hydrophobic effect.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to computing a wide diversity of sequence- and structure-based descriptors, ProtDCal has an special menu called Thermo&Kinetics , which permits the application of empirical models designed by some of the authors to predict protein folding free energy [ 28 ] and its different contributions: the loss of configurational free energy, the hydrophobic effect free energy and the close-packing interaction free energy; as well as a model for predicting folding rate constant [ 50 ], and a scoring potential intended to discriminate among near-native and non-native structural decoys [ 29 ]. All of these models require PDB files as inputs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2). The method requires an understanding of protein catalytic mechanisms and structure‐function relationships as well as thermal stability mechanisms 34–36. However, the scope of rational design applications is still limited due to the weak understanding of the catalytic and thermal stability mechanisms of proteins.…”
Section: Rational Design To Improve Protein Thermal Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%