1999
DOI: 10.1155/s1025583499000314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global smoothness preservation and the variation-diminishing property

Abstract: In the center of our paper are two counterexamples showing the independence of the concepts of global smoothness preservation and variation diminution for sequences of approximation operators. Under certain additional assumptions it is shown that the variation-diminishing property is the stronger one. It is also demonstrated, however, that there are positive linear operators giving an optimal pointwise degree of approximation, and which preserve global smoothness, monotonicity and convexity, but are not variat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-negative linearly consistent approximants have long been studied in the literature [5]. These methods often present a number of attractive features, such as the related properties of monotonicity, the variation diminishing property (the approximation does not create extrema not present in the data), or smoothness preservation [16], of particular interest in the presence of shocks or sharp gradients. The nonoscillatory behavior for discontinuous data of the approximants presented here contrasts with the behavior of second-order triangular finite elements or second-order MLS approximants, as exemplified in Figure 1.…”
Section: Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-negative linearly consistent approximants have long been studied in the literature [5]. These methods often present a number of attractive features, such as the related properties of monotonicity, the variation diminishing property (the approximation does not create extrema not present in the data), or smoothness preservation [16], of particular interest in the presence of shocks or sharp gradients. The nonoscillatory behavior for discontinuous data of the approximants presented here contrasts with the behavior of second-order triangular finite elements or second-order MLS approximants, as exemplified in Figure 1.…”
Section: Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent examples include the natural element method shape functions [11] and subdivision schemes [12]. These methods often present a number of attractive features, such as the related properties of monotonicity, the variation diminishing property (the approximation is not more 'wiggly' than the data), or smoothness preservation [13], of particular interest in the presence of shocks. Furthermore, they lead to well behaved mass matrices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the main purpose of this manuscript is to justify/modify our statement in [13] and show how (1.2) "can be derived from [4,8,9]" (note that [10] in our original statement is replaced by an earlier paper [8]) by constructing positive linear polynomial approximation operators that simultaneously preserve k-monotonicity for all k ≤ q and yield (1.2). Additionally, we make this paper self-contained and provide all proofs (except for some straightforward statements that can be verified directly and some classical properties of ultraspherical polynomials).…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we discuss several properties of the operator H n+2 that was introduced by Gavrea [9]. Everything here follows from [4,9], and we include this section in the current manuscript only for readers' convenience (we also somewhat clean up some of the proofs making them, in our opinion, more transparent by utilizing the notation (3.9) and Corollary 3.5). For any n ∈ N and a fixed (generating) polynomial P n (x) = n k=0 a k x k , Gavrea's operator H n+2 :…”
Section: Gavrea's Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%