2009
DOI: 10.1080/03610730802544708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Self-Esteem Across the Life Span: A Cross-Sectional Comparison Between Representative and Self-Selected Internet Samples

Abstract: The cross-sectional trajectory of global self-esteem across the life span was examined administering the Rosenberg and Single-Item Self-Esteem scales to Estonians (N = 29,463) who were either randomly selected from the National Census to represent the population or self-recruited through the Internet. The results (a) challenge the recent conclusion of a universal age trajectory of self-esteem, (b) demonstrate that self-recruited Internet data collection method is biased compared to random sampling, and (c) pre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
28
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
5
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas the findings of Robins et al (2002) are relatively SELF-ESTEEM DEVELOPMENT 8 similar to the longitudinal evidence reviewed above, the results of McMullin and Cairney (2004) and Pullmann et al (2009) diverge more strongly. A possible explanation for this inconsistency is that cross-sectional data generally suffer from important limitations, such as confounding agerelated changes with cohort effects (Baltes, Cornelius, & Nesselroade, 1979).…”
Section: Previous Research On Lifespan Development Of Self-esteemmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Whereas the findings of Robins et al (2002) are relatively SELF-ESTEEM DEVELOPMENT 8 similar to the longitudinal evidence reviewed above, the results of McMullin and Cairney (2004) and Pullmann et al (2009) diverge more strongly. A possible explanation for this inconsistency is that cross-sectional data generally suffer from important limitations, such as confounding agerelated changes with cohort effects (Baltes, Cornelius, & Nesselroade, 1979).…”
Section: Previous Research On Lifespan Development Of Self-esteemmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Both time metrics explained about equal shares of variance that did not exceed 8% of the total variation in self-esteem. Such findings suggest that in general, long-term self-esteem development may not be adequately described by either age-related or time-to-death-related processes that underlie the existing individual differences (cf., Pullmann et al, 2009). Thus, more mechanism-oriented research on self-esteem is needed to get a better handle at change-inducing effects of life-events or conditions that either support or compromise positive self-evaluations throughout adulthood and particularly late life (see Fauth et al, in press; Ram, Gerstorf, Fauth, Zarit, & Malmberg, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One important aspect that has been revealed by previous studies relates to the substantial individual differences in both levels of and changes in self-esteem across the life span and, particularly so, in old age (Pullmann et al, 2009; Trzesniewski et al, 2003). Correlates related to self-esteem have been identified in a variety of different domains, including socio-demographics, physical health characteristics, cognitive abilities, self-regulation, and social inclusion.…”
Section: Correlates Of Self-esteem Change In Late Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, we did not find any significant difference between the two groups, but their scores fall within normal range, with adolescents in seminary mean score higher than their counter parts. Previous studies on self-esteem have reported inconsistent results during adolescence (Huang 2010;McMullin and Cairney 2004;Pullmann et al 2009;Young and Mroczek 2003). Var et al (2011) in their study on psychosocial problems in Kashmiri youth reported no significant difference between different groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%