2006
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.881729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Retail Chains and Poor Farmers: Evidence from Madagascar

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other buyers opt for detailed contracts with individual farmers, in which case the buyer absorbs the monitoring cost, which can be intensive. In a Madagascar vegetable supply chain, the buyers impose quality and quantity standards at the farm-level, supported by training and close monitoring, performed by a large staff of inspectors and technicians (Minten et al, 2009). …”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other buyers opt for detailed contracts with individual farmers, in which case the buyer absorbs the monitoring cost, which can be intensive. In a Madagascar vegetable supply chain, the buyers impose quality and quantity standards at the farm-level, supported by training and close monitoring, performed by a large staff of inspectors and technicians (Minten et al, 2009). …”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others find very different effects. For example, Minten et al (2007) show that in Madagascar most FFV export production is on very small farms, often on a contract-basis with the agro-food industry, and with important positive effects on farmers' productivity. Similar results are found by studies in Asia (Gulati et al 2006) and in Eastern Europe (Dries and Swinnen, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies find that buyers prefer to contract larger farmers because of lower transaction costs (Key and Runsten, 1999). However, there are also examples where smallholders benefit from contract farming through better access to inputs and technology as well as higher and more stable prices (for a comprehensive review, see Minten et al, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%