2006
DOI: 10.1080/03052150500422294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global response approximation with radial basis functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
97
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
97
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The Radial Basis Function (RBF) can be expressed by the linear combination of the functions in terms of radial distance from the considered point to every interpolation point (or sample point or experiment design point) [12]:…”
Section: Rbf and Augmented Rbf Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Radial Basis Function (RBF) can be expressed by the linear combination of the functions in terms of radial distance from the considered point to every interpolation point (or sample point or experiment design point) [12]:…”
Section: Rbf and Augmented Rbf Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fang and Horstemeyer [12] demonstrate that the approximation accuracy of the augmented Gaussian RBF is higher than that of other types of RBF and its approximation domain is also wider. How to solve this type of models with high approximation accuracy?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide variety of techniques have been discussed in the literature for creating the metamodels [14]. These techniques include response surface modelling [9], Radial Basis Functions ( [2]; [3]), Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines [4] and Support Vector Machine [15]. In this study, a Gaussian stochastic process (Gasp) model was investigated as an alternative technique for approximating a borehole computer model.…”
Section: Modelling Borehole Computer Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steps (2) and (3) are often coupled and considered in line with each other since learning/fitting techniques have evolved to be highly specific and dependent on the metamodel used. Examples of popular metamodels include polynomials (Montgomery, 2008), Kriging (Sacks et al, 1989), neural networks (Cheng and Titterington, 1994), radial basis functions (Fang and Horstemeyer, 2006;Regis and Shoemaker, 2013), multivariate adaptive regression splines (Friedman, 1991), and inductive learning (Wang and Shan, 2007).…”
Section: Metamodelingmentioning
confidence: 99%