2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.101998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global reliability sensitivity analysis by Sobol-based dynamic adaptive kriging importance sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Step 2: Calculate the true responses of the initial sample using the constructed S-FEM of sealing performance and establish an initial KG model based on the N i groups of samples. The prediction sum of squares (PRESS) 18 of the KG model is calculated by using cross validation method, and whether the prediction error value is less than the set prediction error standard R s is determined. If the conditions are satisfied, go directly to Step 3; otherwise, obtain another n us groups of new samples using the LHS method and use the S-FEM to calculate the true responses of the new samples.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis Of Sealing Performance Based On the Kg-sobol Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Step 2: Calculate the true responses of the initial sample using the constructed S-FEM of sealing performance and establish an initial KG model based on the N i groups of samples. The prediction sum of squares (PRESS) 18 of the KG model is calculated by using cross validation method, and whether the prediction error value is less than the set prediction error standard R s is determined. If the conditions are satisfied, go directly to Step 3; otherwise, obtain another n us groups of new samples using the LHS method and use the S-FEM to calculate the true responses of the new samples.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis Of Sealing Performance Based On the Kg-sobol Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its key point is the calculation of the main and total effects of samples. 18 Taking a response with n-dimensional independent variables as an example, k(2 + n) calculations are needed to obtain the main effects of the analysis, and the value of k is usually . 500.…”
Section: High Computational Cost Of the Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, Sensitivity Analysis (SA) can aid the understanding of how the uncertainty in the model is apportioned among the model input parameters uncertainties [10], [11]. In other words, through SA, one can identify the most sensitive parameters and better focus the uncertainty analysis without losing accuracy [12]. Different SA techniques have been proposed in literature, which can be sorted into three main categories: local, regional, and global [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are usually computed via a double-loop Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS), with computational cost equal to 𝐶 = 𝑣 • 𝑛 1 • 𝑛 2 , where 𝑣 is the number of input variables, 𝑛 1 the sample size for estimating the inner loop and 𝑛 2 the sample size for the outer loop [24], [25]. When the model runs are time consuming, the computational cost is high and strategies have been proposed to reduce it, including: reduced order models calibrated on input-output data obtained by few runs of the original model, e.g., Bayesian approaches [26], kriging [12], [27],and polynomial chaos expansion [28], [29]; sampling schemes tailored to efficiently characterize the sensitivity of the model inputs, e.g., Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test (FAST) [30], [31] and Effective Algorithm for computing global Sensitivity Indices (EASI) [32]; finally, data-driven approaches allow exploiting available datasets to calculate sensitivity measures [22], [33], [34], [35], which is quite of interest for many practical applications in which an input-output dataset is available and models to perform a GSA using MCS-based methods cannot be run [22], [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An intelligent optimization algorithm-the improved chaotic particle swarm optimization algorithm [20][21][22][23]was used to analyze the stochastic sensitivity of the angle beam-column joint with a gusset plate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%