2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-020-00650-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global quantitative analysis of the human brain proteome and phosphoproteome in Alzheimer’s disease

Abstract: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterized by an early, asymptomatic phase (AsymAD) in which individuals exhibit amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaque accumulation in the absence of clinically detectable cognitive decline. Here we report an unbiased multiplex quantitative proteomic and phosphoproteomic analysis using tandem mass tag (TMT) isobaric labeling of human post-mortem cortex (n = 27) across pathology-free controls, AsymAD and symptomatic AD individuals. With off-line high-pH fractionation and liquid chromatography … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
109
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
3
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phosphorylation and ubiquitination are PTMs that modulate signaling pathways and pathophysiological mechanisms in AD. Unsurprisingly, these classes of PTMs decorate the MTBR region of tau and are enriched in AD ( Abreha et al, 2018 ; Ping et al, 2018 , 2020 ; Arakhamia et al, 2020 ). Although highly enriched in AD, tau peptides were largely unchanged in AsymAD, demonstrating the late aggregation of tau protein during progression of AD pathology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phosphorylation and ubiquitination are PTMs that modulate signaling pathways and pathophysiological mechanisms in AD. Unsurprisingly, these classes of PTMs decorate the MTBR region of tau and are enriched in AD ( Abreha et al, 2018 ; Ping et al, 2018 , 2020 ; Arakhamia et al, 2020 ). Although highly enriched in AD, tau peptides were largely unchanged in AsymAD, demonstrating the late aggregation of tau protein during progression of AD pathology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study has several limitations, chief among them being the small sample sizes for discovery and validation. This is unfortunately due to a lack of well curated post‐mortem brain samples and the overwhelming majority of similar studies, with few exceptions being limited by this issue (Ping et al., 2018; Portelius et al., 2017). Another limitation is that the BLSA is a unique cohort of highly educated participants (the mean education is approximately 17 years), so findings may not generalize to the population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that existing human AD brain proteomics literature includes studies with a variety of sample sizes ( N = 3 50 - ≥ 900 90 ) and brain regions such as frontal lobe, ( Seyfried et al, 2017 ; Ping et al, 2018 ; Zahid et al, 2014 ; McKetney et al, 2019 ; Minjarez et al, 2016 ; Bai et al, 2020 ; Wang et al, 2020 ; Johnson et al, 2020 ; Johnson et al, 2018 ; Zhang et al, 2018 ; Mendonça et al, 2019 ; Adav et al, 2019 ; Bereczki et al, 2018 ; Ping et al, 2020 ) temporal lobe (including hippocampus), ( Xu et al, 2019 ; Manavalan et al, 2013 ; Zahid et al, 2014 ; McKetney et al, 2019 ; Hondius et al, 2016 ; Begcevic et al, 2013 ; Musunuri et al, 2014 ; Andreev et al, 2012 ; Sultana et al, 2007b ; Haytural et al, 2020 ; Johnson et al, 2020 ; Mendonça et al, 2019 ; Xiong et al, 2019 ) and IPL ( McKetney et al, 2019 ). None included nonpathological regions such as GP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these studies also do not include racial/ethnic diversity of participants. For example, one report exclusively studied Mexican ( Minjarez et al, 2016 ) and another Japanese ( Manavalan et al, 2013 ) adults, while a few included African American/Black, Hispanic, and Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander groups representing 11–13% of study participants ( Seyfried et al, 2017 ; Ping et al, 2018 ; Ping et al, 2020 ). Therefore, these consistent findings increase the confidence of this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%