2015
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1506.04114
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global properties of graphs with local degree conditions

E. Kubicka,
G. Kubicki,
O. R. Oellermann

Abstract: Let P be a graph property. A graph G is said to be locally P (closed locally P, respectively) if the subgraph induced by the open neighbourhood (closed neighbourhood, respectively) of every vertex in G has property P. A graph G of order n is said to satisfy Dirac's condition if δ(G) ≥ n/2 and it satisfies Ore's condition if for every pair u, v of non-adjacent vertices in G, deg(u) + deg(v) ≥ n. A graph is locally Dirac (locally Ore, respectively) if the subgraph induced by the open neighbourhood of every verte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(32 reference statements)
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, they observed that results of Hasratian and Khachatrian [7] imply that every connected locally Dirac graph of order at least 3 is hamiltonian. Our results generalize the mentioned results of Zhang [14] and Kubicka et al [9].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, they observed that results of Hasratian and Khachatrian [7] imply that every connected locally Dirac graph of order at least 3 is hamiltonian. Our results generalize the mentioned results of Zhang [14] and Kubicka et al [9].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…x∈N G (z)∩V (C) (|A k (x)| + |C k (x)|) ≤ x∈N G (z)∩V (C) |A(x) ∪ C(x)| ≤ x∈V (C) n(C) = n(C) 2 ,we obtain a contradiction for k > n(C) 2 , which completes the proof. ✷ Note that Corollary 10 extends the main result, Theorem 3.3, of Kubicka et al[9].Corollary 10 Every connected locally Ore graph G of order at least 3 is fully cycle extendable.Proof: Let G be as in the statement. Let vuw be an induced path of order 3 in G. By inclusion-exclusion, we obtaind G (u) = |{v, w}| + |(N G (v) ∪ N G (w)) ∩ N G (u)| + |N G (u) \ (N G [v] ∪ N G [w])| = 2 + |N G (u) ∩ N G (v)| + |N G (u) ∩ N G (w)| − |N G (u) ∩ N G (v) ∩ N G (w)| +|N G (u) \ (N G [v] ∪ N G [w])|.…”
supporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation