2009
DOI: 10.1515/advgeom.2009.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global properties of codimension two spacelike submanifolds in Minkowski space

Abstract: Abstract. We consider codimension two spacelike submanifolds with a parallel normal field (i.e. vanishing normal curvature) in Minkowski space. We use the analysis of their contacts with hyperplanes and hyperquadrics in order to get some global information on them. As a consequence we obtain new versions of Carathéodory's and Loewner's conjectures on spacelike surfaces in 4-dimensional Minkowski space and 4-flattenings theorems for closed spacelike curves in 3-dimensional Minkowski space.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(35 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kronecker curvature of M is defined as K We say that the embedding X is generic if its associated horospherical height functions family is structurally stable (see [14]), in other words, if X is a generic embedding in H On the other hand, as seen in [12], when M is a closed orientable surface in H 3 + (−1), we can consider a globally defined hyperbolic Gauss map on M (and thus on M ), and consequently, a globally defined Gauss-Kronecker curvature function on M (and thus on M ). For the purposes of the following result, we can either fix the superindex + or − in the above arguments and denote by K hM the globally defined Gauss-Kronecker curvature function on M and by K h the globally defined Gauss-Kronecker curvature function on M .…”
Section: Horospherical Gauss Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Kronecker curvature of M is defined as K We say that the embedding X is generic if its associated horospherical height functions family is structurally stable (see [14]), in other words, if X is a generic embedding in H On the other hand, as seen in [12], when M is a closed orientable surface in H 3 + (−1), we can consider a globally defined hyperbolic Gauss map on M (and thus on M ), and consequently, a globally defined Gauss-Kronecker curvature function on M (and thus on M ). For the purposes of the following result, we can either fix the superindex + or − in the above arguments and denote by K hM the globally defined Gauss-Kronecker curvature function on M and by K h the globally defined Gauss-Kronecker curvature function on M .…”
Section: Horospherical Gauss Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well-known that the Lorentzian space form with zero curvature is Lorentz-Minkowski space and with positive curvature is de Sitter space. These Lorentzian space forms have been well studied (cf., [10,11,13,14,15,16]). However, there are not much results on submanifolds immersed in Anti de Sitter space, in particular from the viewpoint of singularity theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Anti-de Sitter space is a Lorentzian space form with negative curvature. Recently, submanifolds in Lorentz-Minkowski space or de Sitter space have been well investigated (cf., [8,11,13,14,19,20]). However, there are not so many results on submanifolds in anti-de Sitter space, in particular from the viewpoint of singularity theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%