2022
DOI: 10.1002/essoar.10511919.1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global projections of storm surges using high-resolution CMIP6 climate models: validation, projected changes, and methodological challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure S3 in Supporting Information S1, the distributions show some small differences between these two periods (Figures S3a–S3m in Supporting Information S1), especially when SLR leads to more threshold exceedances (Figures S3c–S3m in Supporting Information S1). For other sites without sufficient observed data to estimate distribution differences, we use simulated total water levels from C3SCDS (Muis et al., 2022), which provides total water levels from 1950 to 2018 along the China coastline. The distribution differences (1979–1997 vs. 1950–2018) are small in Lianyungang (Figure S3 in Supporting Information S1) and other sites (not shown).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Figure S3 in Supporting Information S1, the distributions show some small differences between these two periods (Figures S3a–S3m in Supporting Information S1), especially when SLR leads to more threshold exceedances (Figures S3c–S3m in Supporting Information S1). For other sites without sufficient observed data to estimate distribution differences, we use simulated total water levels from C3SCDS (Muis et al., 2022), which provides total water levels from 1950 to 2018 along the China coastline. The distribution differences (1979–1997 vs. 1950–2018) are small in Lianyungang (Figure S3 in Supporting Information S1) and other sites (not shown).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Projections of SLR for tidal gauges along the China coastline are obtained from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) projection tool (Fox‐Kemper et al., 2021; Garner et al., 2021). Simulated water levels from 1950 to 2018 are obtained from the Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS), which provides hourly water levels driven by storm surges, tides, and MSL derived with the Global Tide and Surge Model (GTSM) (Muis et al., 2022).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It performs best in regions with large variability in sea level, that is, in regions with a wide and shallow continental shelf that have high storm surges, and it performs more poorly in regions near the Equator, where storm surges are low. Model performance is higher for 10 min series than for annual maxima, with correlation coefficients above 0.9 and RMSE smaller than 0.1 (Muis et al, 2022). For further details, see Muis et al (2020) and Wang et al (2021).…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Water level time series were applied at the offshore boundary of the SFINCS models. Water level time series were derived from a linear superposition of statistically corrected Global Tide and Surge Model (GTSM; Muis et al, 2016Muis et al, , 2022 outputs and wave setup computed with a parameterized empirical formula (Stockdon et al, 2006) and waves from the ERA5 reanalysis (Hersbach et al, 2020) and projection time-periods (Erikson et al 2022). Both the hydrodynamic and wave models were forced with the same CMIP6 models for the climate projections.…”
Section: Input Datamentioning
confidence: 99%