2020
DOI: 10.5194/gh-75-183-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global production networks and natural resource extraction: adding a political ecology perspective

Abstract: Abstract. The article examines how to adapt the global production network (GPN) approach to situations of natural resource extraction. Based on an integration of a political ecology perspective into GPN research, we exemplarily apply the GPN framework to the primary sector. Based on extensive qualitative fieldwork regarding Argentine lithium mining and Brazilian soy agribusiness we illustrate that particularly a political ecological environmental perspective allows for a more nuanced and critical analysis of a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The threats are clearly related to a developmentalist economic agenda, based on a primary commodities export policy that the government argues is a "consensus." But these types of policies are based on the appropriation and exploitation of nature, and clearly create widespread environmental degradation (Dorn & Huber, 2020) as well as extractivist violence across Latin America (Gudynas, 2019;Svampa, 2019). In Brazil, there is an unhealthy convergence between the commodity boom, neoextractivist policy, and the amplification of territorial conflicts and death threats.…”
Section: Quantification and Characterization Of Defenders Under Prote...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The threats are clearly related to a developmentalist economic agenda, based on a primary commodities export policy that the government argues is a "consensus." But these types of policies are based on the appropriation and exploitation of nature, and clearly create widespread environmental degradation (Dorn & Huber, 2020) as well as extractivist violence across Latin America (Gudynas, 2019;Svampa, 2019). In Brazil, there is an unhealthy convergence between the commodity boom, neoextractivist policy, and the amplification of territorial conflicts and death threats.…”
Section: Quantification and Characterization Of Defenders Under Prote...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GPN is increasingly used to analyse the global organisation of agricultural production, and both the positive and negative impacts of global market integration on smallholders are widely discussed (Alford, 2016;Dorn and Huber 2020;Franz et al, 2018;Grabs and Ponte 2019;Krishnan, 2023;Neilson et al, 2018;Tups and Dannenberg 2021;Vicol et al, 2019). Applying the lessons from this work could benefit agricultural development interventions: recognising the broader social and institutional context reveals synergies between agriculture and broader rural development efforts, such as land use planning, infrastructure development or poverty reduction programmes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por un lado, ciertos trabajos han reparado en el surgimiento de actores claves como figura fundamental en el fortalecimiento organizacional y la elaboración de estrategias jurídicas (Argento y Puente 2019; Gonzalez y Snyder 2021) o el uso de conocimiento experto como factor relevante para los resultados obtenidos por las comunidades (Hidalgo-Bastidas, Boelens e Iscparah 2018). Por otro, algunos trabajos abordaron la construcción identitaria en los salares, las desigualdades socioecológicas y la tensión entre ambientalismo y desarrollo (Argento y Puente 2019), las desigualdades socioecológicas y las modalidades de apropiación del territorio (Göbel 2013) o la construcción de las resistencias como un proyecto de transformación socioecológica más amplio (Dorn y Huber 2020).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified