“…Clades I and IV mainly thrive in temperate and cold, nutrient-rich waters, while clades II and III reside in warm, oligotrophic or mesotrophic areas ( Zwirglmaier et al, 2008 ; Mella-Flores et al, 2011 ), suggesting the existence of cold (I/IV) and warm (II/III) Synechococcus “thermotypes.” This hypothesis was subsequently confirmed by work demonstrating that strains representative of these different clades exhibit distinct thermal preferenda ( Mackey et al, 2013 ; Pittera et al, 2014 ; Breton et al, 2020 ; Six et al, 2021 ), a feature notably linked to differences in the thermostability of light-harvesting complexes ( Pittera et al, 2017 ), lipid desaturase gene content ( Pittera et al, 2018 ) and the ability of some strains to induce photoprotective light dissipation at colder temperatures using the orange carotenoid protein (OCP; Six et al, 2021 ). Field studies using global ocean datasets have allowed to refine the respective ecological niches of the different thermotypes, with clade I extending further north than clade IV ( Paulsen et al, 2016 ; Doré et al, 2022 ) and clades II and III predominating in N- and P-depleted waters, respectively, but also to highlight the importance of a fifth clade within SC 5.1, the CRD1 clade ( Farrant et al, 2016 ; Sohm et al, 2016 ; Kent et al, 2019 ). Initially thought to be limited to the Costa Rica dome area ( Saito et al, 2005 ; Gutiérrez-Rodríguez et al, 2014 ), the latter clade was recently found to be a major component of Synechococcus communities in iron (Fe)-depleted areas ( Farrant et al, 2016 ; Sohm et al, 2016 ; Ahlgren et al, 2020 ).…”