2015
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/17/4/043032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global phase diagram, possible chiral spin liquid, and topological superconductivity in the triangular Kitaev–Heisenberg model

Abstract: The possible ground states of the undoped and doped Kitaev-Heisenberg model on a triangular lattice are studied. For the undoped system, a combination of the numerical exact diagonalization calculation and the four-sublattice transformation analysis suggests one possible exotic phase and four magnetically ordered phases, including a collinear stripe pattern and a noncollinear spiral pattern in the global phase diagram. The exotic phase near the antiferromagnetic (AF) Kitaev point is further investigated using … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
51
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. This model interpolates between two well-known limits, the exactly solvable Kitaev spin liquid [10] at K 2 ¼ 0 and the triangular Kitaev model at K 1 ¼ 0 [28][29][30][31][32]. It is easy to see that a finite K 2 ruins the exact solvability of the NN Kitaev model because the flux operators [10], W p ¼ In the following, we parametrize K 1 ¼ cos ψ and K 2 ¼ sin ψ, and take ψ ∈ ½0; 2πÞ.…”
Section: Model and Phase Diagrammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1. This model interpolates between two well-known limits, the exactly solvable Kitaev spin liquid [10] at K 2 ¼ 0 and the triangular Kitaev model at K 1 ¼ 0 [28][29][30][31][32]. It is easy to see that a finite K 2 ruins the exact solvability of the NN Kitaev model because the flux operators [10], W p ¼ In the following, we parametrize K 1 ¼ cos ψ and K 2 ¼ sin ψ, and take ψ ∈ ½0; 2πÞ.…”
Section: Model and Phase Diagrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem has been studied for both classical [28,29] and quantum spins [30][31][32]. The above analysis for the magnetic phases still holds here, the only difference being that the two legs of each ladder decouple, since they belong to different triangular sublattices.…”
Section: Triangular Kitaev Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting theoretical phase diagrams are characterized by various ordered phases (including those seen experimentally) and by a finite stability window for QSL around the Kitaev limit. Recently, a triangular analog of the KH model 29 for classical 30 and quantum 31,32 spins has been studied numerically. The obtained rich phase diagram includes a Z 2 -vortex crystal phase near the AF Heisenberg limit, and a nematic phase of decoupled Ising chains with subextensive degeneracy at the Kitaev limit 30,31 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic ingredient overarching the low-energy descriptions of such systems is the presence of bond-dependent anisotropic exchange, with the so-called Kitaev interactions [1,30] being the most prominent. As the bond dependence stems from spin-orbit coupling, such interactions are not limited to tricoordinated lattices, but may also appear in other geometries, including the common frustrated geometries of the triangular, kagome, pyrochlore, and hyperkagome lattices [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. In such lattices, the synergy of bond-dependent anisotropy and geometric frustration opens up the possibility for novel cooperative phases even when the anisotropy is not the dominant interaction, as in the above tri-coordinated systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%