2017
DOI: 10.1108/s1479-358x201613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Perspectives on Educational Testing: Examining Fairness, High-Stakes and Policy Reform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A statistically significant higher level of burnout was found for the Taiwanese sample (t (2240) = 28.30, p < .001) for T1 and (t (2060) = 23.60, p < .001) for T2. Although Taiwan and Finland both belong to a cohort of high‐performance countries in science and mathematics fields according to Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (Arbuthnot, 2017), Taiwan students had significantly higher burnout, which might be explained by stress due to high stakes examinations and the test‐based pedagogy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A statistically significant higher level of burnout was found for the Taiwanese sample (t (2240) = 28.30, p < .001) for T1 and (t (2060) = 23.60, p < .001) for T2. Although Taiwan and Finland both belong to a cohort of high‐performance countries in science and mathematics fields according to Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (Arbuthnot, 2017), Taiwan students had significantly higher burnout, which might be explained by stress due to high stakes examinations and the test‐based pedagogy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to ensure equity of assessment for students coming from non-mainstream cultures or migrant families, assessment should be 'culturally responsive' (Hood 1998a, b;Hood et al 2015;Arbuthnot 2017;Brown et al 2019). A range of assessment methods that provide additional opportunities for students to demonstrate their learning have been proposed.…”
Section: Assessment and Cultural Diversity In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is not only teaching that offers potential pitfalls for migrant students aiming to achieve to their full potential. There are other connected practices such as assessment that, according to Arbuthnot (2017) among others, need to be considered in all learning environments, as assessment has the potential to act as a powerful catalyst to improve teaching and learning (Hattie 2009) and in most countries also opens up entry to further education and employment (Black and Wiliam 2012;Shepard 2006;Popham 2009). In addition, for migrant students, there is also a historical and cultural dilemma that needs to be overcome, as the dominant modes of assessment, together with the assessment competencies of teachers, are also, by tradition, linked with the cultural, historical and political agendas that exist in migrant-receiving countries and can have a positive or negative effect on student learning (Crichton 1998;Isaacs 2010;LeMétais 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to NCLB and the use of high-stakes testing to measure accountability in schools, international policies have provided specious evidence around improving school capacities and addressing inequities in educational opportunities (Lee & Kang, 2019). Though NCLB has since been replaced by the ESSA in 2015, test-based accountability systems continue to drive educational agendas globally (e.g., in Qatar and Finland; Arbuthnot, 2017). Despite the varied educational and cultural contexts in which testing can occur internationally, measurement and myopic focus on student performance alone seem to be misguided attempts at improving educational attainment (Arbuthnot, 2017; United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization [UNESCO], 2017).…”
Section: Accountability Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though NCLB has since been replaced by the ESSA in 2015, test-based accountability systems continue to drive educational agendas globally (e.g., in Qatar and Finland; Arbuthnot, 2017). Despite the varied educational and cultural contexts in which testing can occur internationally, measurement and myopic focus on student performance alone seem to be misguided attempts at improving educational attainment (Arbuthnot, 2017; United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization [UNESCO], 2017).…”
Section: Accountability Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%