Global Patterns of Mortality in International Migrants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Background 258 million people reside outside their country of birth; however, to date no global systematic reviews or meta-analyses of mortality data for these international migrants have been done. We aimed to review and synthesise available mortality data on international migrants.Methods In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases for observational studies, systematic reviews, and randomised controlled trials published between Jan 1, 2001, and March 31, 2017, without language restrictions. We included studies reporting mortality outcomes for international migrants of any age residing outside their country of birth. Studies that recruited participants exclusively from intensive care or high dependency hospital units, with an existing health condition or status, or a particular health exposure were excluded. We also excluded studies limited to maternal or perinatal outcomes. We screened studies using systematic review software and extracted data from published reports. The main outcomes were all-cause and International Classification of Diseases, tenth revision (ICD-10) cause-specific standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) and absolute mortality rates. We calculated summary estimates using randomeffects models. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42017073608.Findings Of the 12 480 articles identified by our search, 96 studies were eligible for inclusion. The studies were geographically diverse and included data from all global regions and for 92 countries. 5464 mortality estimates for more than 15·2 million migrants were included, of which 5327 (97%) were from high-income countries, 115 (2%) were from middle-income countries, and 22 (<1%) were from low-income countries. Few studies included mortality estimates for refugees (110 estimates), asylum seekers (144 estimates), or labour migrants (six estimates). The summary estimate of all-cause SMR for international migrants was lower than one when compared with the general population in destination countries (0·70 [95% CI 0·65-0·76]; I²=99·8%). All-cause SMR was lower in both male migrants (0·72 [0·63-0·81]; I²=99·8%) and female migrants (0·75 [0·67-0·84]; I²=99·8%) compared with the general population. A mortality advantage was evident for refugees (SMR 0·50 [0·46-0·54]; I²=89·8%), but not for asylum seekers (1·05 [0·89-1·24]; I²=54·4%), although limited data was available on these groups. SMRs for all causes of death were lower in migrants compared with the general populations in the destination country across all 13 ICD-10 categories analysed, with the exception of infectious diseases and external causes. Heterogeneity was high across the majority of analyses. Point estimates of all-cause age-standardised mortality in migrants ranged from 420 to 874 per 100 000 population.Interpretation Our study showed that international migrants have a mortality advantage compared with general populations, and that this advantage persisted across the majority of ICD-10 disease categorie...

Evidencing the gap between health expectancy and life expectancy for ethnic groups in Scotland.

“…For example, a mortality advantage has been shown in Hispanic populations in the US comparative to their low socio-economic status, often referred to as the «Hispanic mortality paradox» (Abraído-Lanza et al, 2005;Arias et al, 2010;Elo et al, 2004;Markides, Eschbach, 2005;Ruiz et al, 2013). In Europe, there is also a growing body of evidence on a «migrant mortality advantage» although with variation across countries and migrant groups (Aldridge et al, 2018;Anson, 2004;Brahimi, 1980;Deboosere, Gadeyne, 2005;Gadd et al, 2006;Ikram et al, 2016;Khlat, Darmon, 2003;Khlat, Guillot, 2017;Marmot et al, 1984;Moncho et al, 2015;Syse et al, 2018;Uitenbroek, Verhoeff, 2002;Wallace, Kulu, 2015). The reasons for this phenomenon are not fully understood.…”

Health of migrants: simple questions can improve care

“…Although the biggest por tion of medical resources is allocated to the socalled developed world, most of the affected people live in low income and middleincome regions. 3 Important results have materialised from global collaboration on this issue (eg, the Paris climate agree ment). However, to achieve sustainable solu tions, the concept of global gover nanceie, Weltinnenpolitik, a term first coined by Carl Friedrich von Weizsäckerwill have to be implemented.…”

“…2 The approach de scribed by Cabieses aligns with the Ministry of Health of Chile's principles for dealing with migrants who require access to health care. 3 Health actions for migrants need to be addressed within the wider con text of healthcare access, particularly for the local marginalised populations, and be supported by a political will to reduce inequality. In the context of the current humanitarian crisis in Venezuela, it is important to note the positive developments in social protection mechanisms and the expansion of the health system in South America over the past few decades.…”

Multimorbidity and chronic diseases among undocumented migrants: evidence to contradict the myths

“…Numerous studies of the general migrant population have confirmed the "healthy migrant effect", and show that within this population health status is better at arrival but rapidly declines with increased length of stay in the host country [9][10][11][12]. However, owing to great inconsistency in the demographic and health data of migrants, there is a major knowledge gap regarding the health status of UMs [8].…”