2024
DOI: 10.1080/1059924x.2024.2304704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Patterns of Agricultural Machine and Equipment Injuries- A Systematic Literature Review

Mian Muhammad Sajid Raza,
Sihan Li,
Salah F. Issa
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the "man" factor, studies on farmer safety promotion consistently identified personal factors, particularly worker skill levels, as the most prevalent cause of accidents [59]. In the categories of defects in work methods and inappropriate work situation, insufficient safety education and excessive workloads emerged as major contributing factors, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the "man" factor, studies on farmer safety promotion consistently identified personal factors, particularly worker skill levels, as the most prevalent cause of accidents [59]. In the categories of defects in work methods and inappropriate work situation, insufficient safety education and excessive workloads emerged as major contributing factors, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These amputations lead to significant social, cultural, and financial losses [12]. In a recent literature review of agricultural injuries in Asia, the primary causes of agricultural injuries were tractors (38%), hand and power tools (23%), and harvesting machinery (13%) [22]. There is a need to understand machine injury trends in Pakistan to develop targeted research programs, new safety awareness, or regulation campaigns to reduce machine injuries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these questions were set up in a matrix format with the options (such as age group) listed in Table 1. The options were developed through consulting the literature reports from Pakistan and a global literature review conducted recently [6,9,11,22]. Each of the options was listed as a column, with either gender (for source, type, and age questions) or fatality (for the month question) in the row, and participants were requested to complete the matrix.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%