2022
DOI: 10.1038/s43247-022-00603-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global patterns and predictors of C:N:P in marine ecosystems

Abstract: Oceanic nutrient cycles are coupled, yet carbon-nitrogen-phosphorus (C:N:P) stoichiometry in marine ecosystems is variable through space and time, with no clear consensus on the controls on variability. Here, we analyze hydrographic, plankton genomic diversity, and particulate organic matter data from 1970 stations sampled during a global ocean observation program (Bio-GO-SHIP) to investigate the biogeography of surface ocean particulate organic matter stoichiometry. We find latitudinal variability in C:N:P st… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
28
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
2
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous study ( 46 ) also argued that some phytoplankton, especially N 2 -fixing microbes, can acquire P by vertically migrating to P-replete subsurface waters. These physiological processes, as well as the interactive temperature and nutrient-supply control of phytoplankton C:P, may evolve in ways that are not necessarily consistent with the assumed contemporary relationship between surface PO 4 concentrations and phytoplankton C:P uptake, likely generating additional uncertainty ( 10 , 12 , 16 ) beyond those discussed here. Additional sources of uncertainty include an assumption of the C:P responses that are equally applied to all phytoplankton functional types and an assumption of a fixed phytoplankton C:N, all of which could lead to an uncertainty in relative contributions of each phytoplankton function type to the simulated NPP responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A previous study ( 46 ) also argued that some phytoplankton, especially N 2 -fixing microbes, can acquire P by vertically migrating to P-replete subsurface waters. These physiological processes, as well as the interactive temperature and nutrient-supply control of phytoplankton C:P, may evolve in ways that are not necessarily consistent with the assumed contemporary relationship between surface PO 4 concentrations and phytoplankton C:P uptake, likely generating additional uncertainty ( 10 , 12 , 16 ) beyond those discussed here. Additional sources of uncertainty include an assumption of the C:P responses that are equally applied to all phytoplankton functional types and an assumption of a fixed phytoplankton C:N, all of which could lead to an uncertainty in relative contributions of each phytoplankton function type to the simulated NPP responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This plasticity of elemental allocations from molecules to communities is one of the key features that allows phytoplankton assemblages to acclimate and adapt to a wide range of environmental conditions ( 13 15 ). This stoichiometric plasticity adds considerable uncertainty to projections of marine net primary production (NPP) and the global carbon cycle, which depend, in part, on how phytoplankton C:N:P composition may respond to climate change ( 16 ) and how the stoichiometric modulation of NPP may feed back on rising atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) ( 17 , 18 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These cellular nutrient quotas are invariant for fixed stoichiometry models (i.e., at Redfield proportions; Aumont et al., 2015; Dunne et al., 2010; Ilyina et al., 2013; Moore et al., 2004) or can be variable, dependent on in situ environmental parameters such as nutrient concentration (Galbraith & Martiny, 2015) or optimal resource allocation theory describing phytoplankton cellular functions (Dunne, 2013; Klausmeier et al., 2004; Kwiatkowski et al., 2018). Many culture and field observations have documented variability in cellular nutrient quotas that vary both with ambient nutrient concentrations (Karl et al., 2001; Rhee, 1978; Tanioka et al., 2022) and/or across PFTs (Baer et al., 2017; Geider & La Roche, 2002; Martiny et al., 2013a; Quigg et al., 2003). Additionally, with the emergence of flow cytometry for the study of marine microbes (Lomas et al., 2011), a large literature of field and culture‐based studies have accumulated in recent decades describing the physiology, biogeography, and phylogeny of marine pico‐phytoplankton, more specifically the cyanobacterial lineages Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus and pico‐eukaryotic phytoplankton, which now allows for their representation in numerical marine ecosystem models (e.g., Baer et al., 2017; Buitenhuis et al., 2012; DuRand et al., 2001; Flombaum et al., 2013, 2020; Martiny et al., 2009; Moore et al., 1998; Partensky et al., 1999; Pasulka et al., 2013; Sohm et al., 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Redfield ratio describes the ocean C:N:P stoichiometry and is used in models to assess export and productivity [5,6]. However, elemental ratios are variable in surface ecosystem [7,8], and ratios in the interior ocean may change over long-time scales, thereby influencing the ability of the oceans to sequester carbon relative to other nutrient elements [9]. Small cyanobacteria are currently estimated to account for approximately 25% of marine net primary production [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%