2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2011.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Partnerships for Professional Development: A Cambodian Exemplar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2008). The second discusses how the Khmer Rouge dictatorship systematically targeted health professionals during the Cambodian genocide, leading to a shortage of nurses that persists today (Lasater et al. 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…2008). The second discusses how the Khmer Rouge dictatorship systematically targeted health professionals during the Cambodian genocide, leading to a shortage of nurses that persists today (Lasater et al. 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These challenges included lack of resources to conduct research and lack of supplies and education materials for nurses from LIC, which were rectified through the formation of respective nursing partnerships (Bender et al. 2011; Lasater et al. 2012; Malloy et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The majority of nursing programs in HueUMP have partner institutions worldwide, including other less-developed countries, and it is not difficult to meet global partners in those developing countries. According to Sies et al (18), Tvelt et al (19), and Lasater et al (20), the respect of partner nursing program's partners may enable sustainable performance and create a future in nursing as a global network. It would be a very good strategy to use witnesses outside of the project to monitor and global partners to encourage faculty's efforts in upgrading nursing programs from various viewpoints and cooperating as required with outside experts on weak areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%