Abstract:We propose two algorithms for the solution of the Optimal Power Flow (OPF) problem to global optimality. The algorithms are based on the spatial branch and bound framework with lower bounds on the optimal objective function value calculated by solving either the Lagrangian dual or the semidefinite programming (SDP) relaxation. We show that this approach can solve to global optimality the general form of the OPF problem including: generation power bounds, apparent and real power line limits, voltage limits and … Show more
“…Further, the above approaches provide no recourse when sufficient conditions are not satisfied. The work of Lesieutre et al [24] and Gopalakrishnan et al [1] provide examples that fail to satisfy the sufficient conditions.…”
Section: A Literature Surverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we are interested in extending the algorithm in [1] for the solution of MOPF. The MOPF is time coupled due to the presence of storage at various buses in the network.…”
Section: B Our Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently the authors [1] proposed to solve the OPF problem using a branch and bound (B & B) algorithm with SDP based lower bounds. The proposed approach does not make assumptions on the network topology or the type of bounds.…”
In this work, we extend the algorithm proposed in [1] to solve multi-period optimal power flow (MOPF) problems to global optimality. The multi-period version of the OPF is time coupled due to the integration of storage systems into the network, and ramp constraints on the generators. The global optimization algorithm is based on the spatial branch and bound framework with lower bounds on the optimal objective function value calculated by solving a semidefinite programming (SDP) relaxation of the MOPF. The proposed approach does not assume convexity and is more general than the ones presented previously for the solution of MOPF. We present a case study of the IEEE 57 bus instance with a time varying demand profile. The integration of storage in the network helps to satisfy loads during high demands and the ramp constraints ensure smooth generation profiles. The SDP relaxation does not satisfy the rank condition, and our optimization algorithm is able to guarantee global optimality within reasonable computational time.
American Control Conference (ACC)This work may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in part for any commercial purpose. Permission to copy in whole or in part without payment of fee is granted for nonprofit educational and research purposes provided that all such whole or partial copies include the following: a notice that such copying is by permission of Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc.; an acknowledgment of the authors and individual contributions to the work; and all applicable portions of the copyright notice. Copying, reproduction, or republishing for any other purpose shall require a license with payment of fee to Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. All rights reserved. Abstract-In this work, we extend the algorithm proposed in [1] to solve multi-period optimal power flow (MOPF) problems to global optimality. The multi-period version of the OPF is time coupled due to the integration of storage systems into the network, and ramp constraints on the generators. The global optimization algorithm is based on the spatial branch and bound framework with lower bounds on the optimal objective function value calculated by solving a semidefinite programming (SDP) relaxation of the MOPF. The proposed approach does not assume convexity and is more general than the ones presented previously for the solution of MOPF. We present a case study of the IEEE 57 bus instance with a time varying demand profile. The integration of storage in the network helps to satisfy loads during high demands and the ramp constraints ensure smooth generation profiles. The SDP relaxation does not satisfy the rank condition, and our optimization algorithm is able to guarantee global optimality within reasonable computational time.
“…Further, the above approaches provide no recourse when sufficient conditions are not satisfied. The work of Lesieutre et al [24] and Gopalakrishnan et al [1] provide examples that fail to satisfy the sufficient conditions.…”
Section: A Literature Surverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we are interested in extending the algorithm in [1] for the solution of MOPF. The MOPF is time coupled due to the presence of storage at various buses in the network.…”
Section: B Our Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently the authors [1] proposed to solve the OPF problem using a branch and bound (B & B) algorithm with SDP based lower bounds. The proposed approach does not make assumptions on the network topology or the type of bounds.…”
In this work, we extend the algorithm proposed in [1] to solve multi-period optimal power flow (MOPF) problems to global optimality. The multi-period version of the OPF is time coupled due to the integration of storage systems into the network, and ramp constraints on the generators. The global optimization algorithm is based on the spatial branch and bound framework with lower bounds on the optimal objective function value calculated by solving a semidefinite programming (SDP) relaxation of the MOPF. The proposed approach does not assume convexity and is more general than the ones presented previously for the solution of MOPF. We present a case study of the IEEE 57 bus instance with a time varying demand profile. The integration of storage in the network helps to satisfy loads during high demands and the ramp constraints ensure smooth generation profiles. The SDP relaxation does not satisfy the rank condition, and our optimization algorithm is able to guarantee global optimality within reasonable computational time.
American Control Conference (ACC)This work may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in part for any commercial purpose. Permission to copy in whole or in part without payment of fee is granted for nonprofit educational and research purposes provided that all such whole or partial copies include the following: a notice that such copying is by permission of Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc.; an acknowledgment of the authors and individual contributions to the work; and all applicable portions of the copyright notice. Copying, reproduction, or republishing for any other purpose shall require a license with payment of fee to Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. All rights reserved. Abstract-In this work, we extend the algorithm proposed in [1] to solve multi-period optimal power flow (MOPF) problems to global optimality. The multi-period version of the OPF is time coupled due to the integration of storage systems into the network, and ramp constraints on the generators. The global optimization algorithm is based on the spatial branch and bound framework with lower bounds on the optimal objective function value calculated by solving a semidefinite programming (SDP) relaxation of the MOPF. The proposed approach does not assume convexity and is more general than the ones presented previously for the solution of MOPF. We present a case study of the IEEE 57 bus instance with a time varying demand profile. The integration of storage in the network helps to satisfy loads during high demands and the ramp constraints ensure smooth generation profiles. The SDP relaxation does not satisfy the rank condition, and our optimization algorithm is able to guarantee global optimality within reasonable computational time.
“…These approaches include heuristics that attempt to find "nearby" local solutions (that may often be, in fact, the global solution) [30], [31] and the use of a branchand-bound method to eliminate the gap between the lower bound from a relaxation and the upper bound from a nonlinear programming solver [32]. We next discusses an alternative to these approaches that generalizes the semidefinite relaxation using the Lasserre hierarchy of moment relaxations.…”
Abstract-Power system planning and operation offers multitudinous opportunities for optimization methods. In practice, these problems are generally large-scale, non-linear, subject to uncertainties, and combine both continuous and discrete variables. In the recent years, a number of complementary theoretical advances in addressing such problems have been obtained in the field of applied mathematics. The paper introduces a selection of these advances in the fields of non-convex optimization, in mixedinteger programming, and in optimization under uncertainty. The practical relevance of these developments for power systems planning and operation are discussed, and the opportunities for combining them, together with high-performance computing and big data infrastructures, as well as novel machine learning and randomized algorithms, are highlighted.
“…To obtain a feasible optimal solution of the OPF, the polynomial optimization approach based on the moment relaxation has been proposed in [11] and [12], and the branch and bound method for OPF has been investigated in [13]. Although these global optimization approaches guarantee the global optimal solution which is also a feasible solution of OPF, but these algorithms may not be computationally tractable.…”
Abstract-The optimal power flow (OPF) problem is fundamental to power system planing and operation. It is a nonconvex optimization problem and the semidefinite programing (SDP) relaxation has been proposed recently. However, the SDP relaxation may give an infeasible solution to the original OPF problem. In this paper, we apply the alternating direction method of multiplier method to recover a feasible solution when the solution of the SDP relaxation is infeasible to the OPF problem. Specifically, the proposed procedure iterates between a convex optimization problem, and a non-convex optimization with the rank constraint. By exploiting the special structure of the rank constraint, we obtain a closed form solution of the non-convex optimization based on the singular value decomposition. As a result, we obtain a computationally tractable heuristic for the OPF problem. Although the convergence of the algorithm is not theoretically guaranteed, our simulations show that a feasible solution can be recovered using our method.
NOTATIONi is the imaginary unit. W * is the Hermitian of W , Tr (W ) is a trace of W , and W F = Tr (W W * ) is the Frobenius norm of W . The generalized inequality, W 0, means W is a positive semidefinite matrix.The projection operator Π S (W ) = argmin Z∈S W − Z 2 F , is the projection of W onto the set S.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.