2006
DOI: 10.1287/inte.1060.0251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Optimization of Emergency Evacuation Assignments

Abstract: Conventional emergency evacuation plans often assign evacuees to fixed routes or destinations based mainly on geographic proximity. Such approaches can be inefficient if the roads are congested, blocked, or otherwise dangerous because of the emergency. By not constraining evacuees to prespecified destinations, a one-destination evacuation approach provides flexibility in the optimization process. We present a framework for the simultaneous optimization of evacuation-traffic distribution and assignment. Based o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, instead of assigning the demand to pre-fixed destinations, evacuees are directed to the nearest safe destination outside of the impacted area. Chiu et al [39] and Han et al [40] propose the One-Destination evacuation model in which the traditional road network with m origins to n destinations has been modified to a network with m origin to one destination. Chiu et al [39] applied a system optimal dynamic traffic Cell Transmission Model to a simple evacuation event to solve the evacuation destination-route-flow-staging problem.…”
Section: Destination Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, instead of assigning the demand to pre-fixed destinations, evacuees are directed to the nearest safe destination outside of the impacted area. Chiu et al [39] and Han et al [40] propose the One-Destination evacuation model in which the traditional road network with m origins to n destinations has been modified to a network with m origin to one destination. Chiu et al [39] applied a system optimal dynamic traffic Cell Transmission Model to a simple evacuation event to solve the evacuation destination-route-flow-staging problem.…”
Section: Destination Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,17,18,19,20, and 21. In particular, Cova et al [22] propose a lane-based model which minimizes the total travel distance considering forbidding intersections crossing conflicts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are considerably several studies that address different aspects of disaster relief logistics. These include location (e.g., Drezner et al [5] on casualty collection points; Doerner et al [6] on shelter/temporary housing location and/or allocation; Akkihal [7], Jia et al [8], and Balcik and Beamon [9] on location of RDCs; and Berman et al [10,11] on transfer point location), location-allocation (see for instance, Sherali et al [12], Tzeng et al [13]), inventory aspects (e.g., Beamon and Kotleba [14]; Whybark [15]; Lodree and Taskin [16]), relief distribution (e.g., Haghani and Oh [17]; Viswanath and Peeta [18]; Ozdamar et al [19]; Barbarosoglu and Arda [20]; Amiri [21]; Yi and Kumar [22]; Sheu [23]; Campbell et al [24] and Yuan and Wang [25]), evacuation process planning (see, for instance, Han et al [26]; Yi and Kumar [22]; Yi and Ozdamar [27]; Ozdamar and Yi [28]; Regnier [29]; Chiou and Lai [30]; Stepanov and Smith [31] and Saadatseresht et al [32]); and location routing (see, for instance, Yi and Ozdamar [27]; Ukkusuri and Yushimito [33]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%