Global oncology and cancer disparities education.

Abstract

11006 Background: Comprehensive patient care requires an understanding of medical guidelines and the intersectional context of the patient’s identity and experiences. Hematology/Oncology programs must explicitly teach topics addressing various disparities of care to prepare trainees for informed care. We have developed a Global Oncology and Disparities of Cancer Program to address this gap. Methods: The telementoring program was piloted in 2019 at Dartmouth and has evolved to include didactics, discussion, and evaluations. Participants from across the globe include medical students, residents, Hematology/Oncology Fellows, Faculty, Global Health Scholars, and cancer clinicians. US Hematology/Oncology trainees from Dartmouth and the University of Connecticut consistently participate in the international program. Monthly sessions from September 2021-June 2022 include: Esophageal and GI Cancers in Rwanda, HCC and Cholangiocarcinomas, Gastric Cancer, ASCO International, Global Med ED in Haiti, Breast Cancer in Kosovo, Breast Cancer Risk Factor Prediction Tools Research, Shared Decision Making in Breast Cancer, Hemoglobinopathies, and Health Disparities and Capacity-Building in Rwanda. A pre-course survey was sent to identify participant’s demographics, barriers, and expectations. We will administer a post-course survey. Results: We have preliminary data for our ongoing project. However, we anticipate complete data collection and analysis before the ASCO Meeting. 24 participants were enrolled. 12 (52%) of the participants were located outside of the US in locations such as Haiti, Kosovo, and France. Using a 5-point Likert scale, 11 (46%) participants were “not at all” or only “slightly” aware of obstacles faced by Oncology patients and caregivers in seeking access to healthcare in the US. 7 (29%) participants answered similarly regarding those in low- and middle-income countries. Meanwhile, participants rated ‘’gaining different perspectives’’ as their most important reason for attending with 19 (79%) rating this as “very important” or above. For anticipated improvement from the course, understanding risk factors and cancer biology internationally and recognizing disparities in healthcare between domestic and international settings were the highest rated with 18 (75%) expecting an improvement to a “large degree” or higher. Conclusions: We developed a virtual educational experience to enhance participants’ ability to address disparities of care through challenging Global Oncology topics. Our course is ongoing however initial surveys show a need and desire for this content from participants. We intend to analyze the course surveys to shape future courses. This program can serve as a model for Hematology-Oncology programs to address unmet needs in the curriculum and prepare trainees to provide more complete care to improve cancer outcomes.