1990
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0477(1990)071<1410:gnwpat>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Numerical Weather Prediction at the National Meteorological Center

Abstract: In this paper we describe the global numerical weather prediction system of the National Meteorological Center, and review recent improvements , the evolution in skill, and current research projects and plans.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
164
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 286 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
164
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In an earlier study by Antier et al [2007], Ground-To-Space (G2S) [Drob et al, 2003] models have been validated using infrasound from Mount Yasur. The G2S specifications used by Antier et al [2007] were based on the NOAA Global Forecast System (GFS) operational analysis fields [Kalnay et al, 1990] in the 0 to 35 km altitude region, the NASA GEOS4 (Goddard Earth Observing System Version 4) system outputs [Bloom et al, 2005] in the 35 to 65 km region, and the HWM93/NRLMSISE-00 empirical models [Hedin et al, 1996;Picone et al, 2002] above. It should be noted that the GEOS4 system has been superseded by the NASA Goddard Earth Observing System Version 5 (GEOS5)/Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications analysis system, which currently provides outputs comparable to ECMWF up to 75 km, but at 3 h intervals at 0.25 × 0.33 • resolution [Rienecker et al, 2011].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an earlier study by Antier et al [2007], Ground-To-Space (G2S) [Drob et al, 2003] models have been validated using infrasound from Mount Yasur. The G2S specifications used by Antier et al [2007] were based on the NOAA Global Forecast System (GFS) operational analysis fields [Kalnay et al, 1990] in the 0 to 35 km altitude region, the NASA GEOS4 (Goddard Earth Observing System Version 4) system outputs [Bloom et al, 2005] in the 35 to 65 km region, and the HWM93/NRLMSISE-00 empirical models [Hedin et al, 1996;Picone et al, 2002] above. It should be noted that the GEOS4 system has been superseded by the NASA Goddard Earth Observing System Version 5 (GEOS5)/Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications analysis system, which currently provides outputs comparable to ECMWF up to 75 km, but at 3 h intervals at 0.25 × 0.33 • resolution [Rienecker et al, 2011].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using other Earth orientation parameter series produced by other institutes (e.g., by the IERS Rapid Service/Prediction Center of the United States Naval Observatory, Washington, DC) would lead to the same conclusions since the agreement between the various data sets reaches 1 http://hpiers.obspm.fr/eop-pc a few mas, which is far below the CW amplitude variations investigated in this paper. We considered the geophysical forcing made up of (i) atmospheric angular momentum (AAM) as given by the National Center for Environmental Prediction/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP/NCAR) reanalysis project (Kalnay et al 1996), and (ii) oceanic angular momentum (OAM) output from the ECCO model that employs the MIT global circulation model in a near-global domain (Fukumori et al 2002). The model is forced by NCEP/NCAR reanalysis products (12-hourly wind stresses, daily adiabatic air-sea fluxes).…”
Section: The Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was based on the NCEP T80/L18 model (Kanamitsu, 1989;Kalnay et al, 1990;Kanamitsu et al, 1991) and subsequent changes were made to the T80/L18 model at NCMRWF. Atmospheric dynamics were based on primitive equations with vorticity, divergence, logarithm of surface pressure, specific humidity and virtual temperature as dependent variables.…”
Section: T-170 Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%