Global naturopathy research as reflected by Scopus during 2000-2019

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to analyze research output in the naturopathy field at the global level and to examine the various trends in scientific literature available on naturopathy using bibliometric analysis. Design/methodology/approach The data was collected from the SciVerse Scopus database published from 2000 through 2019. The search was conducted using Medical Subject headings entry terms, i.e. “Naturopathy” OR “Naturopathic Medicine” using the “Document” search option. The search results comprised of documents that had these above search terms in their article title, abstract and keywords. The retrieved documents were then analyzed concerning different parameters like the growth of publications, authorship patterns, productive countries and institutions, highly cited papers, top prolific authors, funding agencies and document types. Findings The results of this study reveal that a total of 1,099 documents were published during 20-year time span. The most preferred publication type is research articles 683 (62.14%). Germany, USA, Australia, India and Canada were the most productive countries in terms of the number of scientific documents. The findings also show that the most preferred journal in the field of naturopathy is MMW Fortschritte der Medizin, with 115 documents followed by Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine with 58 documents. In contrast, the journal BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine had the highest citations per paper (17.85). For the 20-year study period, the average value for the degree of collaboration was calculated as 0.57, indicating 54% of the total publications in naturopathy were multi-authored. The value of the collaboration coefficient (CC) signifies the levels of multi-authored papers. CC was highest in the year 2019 (0.55) indicating that the publications were contributed in collaboration rather than in isolation and the number of multi-authored/mega-authored papers outnumbered the single authors in the collection of all authors in the year 2019. Bastyr University, USA was the most productive Institution. Journal articles were the most preferred form of publication. Practical implications This study traces various trends in the research behavior and preferences of researchers in the field of naturopathy. It thus can be of immense help to identify strong areas in naturopathy research. Further, this study will help the librarians to identify the core/preferred journals in naturopathy. Originality/value This paper makes an endeavor to carry an extensive bibliometric study that provides an overview of emerging trends in naturopathy research.

Unveiling research productivity of premier IIMs of India (2010–2021)

“…The majority of studies, including Tyagi (2022a, b), Borgohain et al. (2022), Khan et al. (2021), Ramos-Rodriguez et al.…”

Ayurveda research: Emerging trends and mapping to sustainable development goals

“…Bibliometrics research in acupuncture includes a systematic review of acupuncture therapy [ 26 ], low back pain [ 27 ], and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) (Wieland et al., 2021). Similar studies have been undertaken in the fields of yoga for health [ 26 , 28 ], randomized controlled trials of yoga [ 29 ], Naturopathy, and traditional Medicine for stroke [ 30 ]. Another research on bibliometrics explains the publication patterns of the literature on the use of complementary and alternative medicine, including Ayurveda, for HIV/AIDS [ 31 ].…”